Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been reading Bredon's Topology and Geometry recently; what an excellent book! He defines smooth manifolds in two distinct ways and then shows they are in fact equivalent. The "non-standard" definition is in terms of some sheaf-like "functional structure $F_X$ " on the underlying space $X$, satisfying the following properties: for every open set $U \subset X,$ we have

  1. $F_X(U)$ is a subalgebra of the algebra of continuous real-valued functions on $U$;
  2. $F_X(U)$ contains all constant functions;
  3. $V \subset U, f \in F_X(U) \implies f|_V \in F_X(V)$;
  4. $U = \bigcup U_{\alpha}$ and $f|_{U_{\alpha}} \in F_X(U_{\alpha})$ for all $\alpha \implies f \in F_X(U).$

A morphism of functionally structured spaces $(X,F_X) \rightarrow (Y,F_Y)$ is a map $\phi:X \rightarrow Y$ such that $f \mapsto f \circ \phi$ carries $F_Y(U)$ into $F_X(\phi^{-1}(U))$.

Then a smooth $n$-manifold is a second countable, functionally structured, Hausdorff space $(M^n,F)$ which is locally isomorphic to $(\mathbb{R}^n,C^{\infty}).$

My question: to familiarize myself with the definition I have attempted the following exercise:

Show that a second countable Hausdorff space $X$ with a functional structure $F$ is an $n$-manifold $\iff$ every point in $X$ has a neighborhood $U$ such that there are functions $f_1,\ldots,f_n \in F(U)$ such that a real-valued function $g$ on $U$ is in $F(U) \iff$ there exists a smooth function $h(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ of $n$ real variables such that $g(p) = h(f_1(p),\ldots,f_n(p))$ for every $p \in U.$

The only part that I haven't been able to complete is the "$\Longleftarrow$" direction. That is, given the $n$ "coordinate functions" $f_i$, and given a point $x \in X$ and a neighborhood $U \ni x$ I, have constructed a morphism $\phi:(U,F_U) \rightarrow (\phi(U),C^{\infty})$ via $\phi(x) = (f_1(x),\ldots,f_n(x)).$ But for the life of me, I don't see how I could show that this is actually an isomorphism.

Any hint toward the answer would be greatly appreciated!

share|improve this question
    
possible duplicate of Functionally structured spaces and manifolds –  Zhen Lin Aug 10 '13 at 23:16
    
@ZhenLin Oh, my bad. If I am reading correctly, does this mean that the problem as stated above is false? –  A.P. Aug 11 '13 at 16:03
    
@Alex P. Yes, it is false. I provide an asnwer below. –  John Aug 22 '13 at 18:32
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The implication $\Leftarrow$ you are considering is false. The functionally structured space $(\mathbb{R},F)$ I defined here provides a counterexample. It is not an smooth manifold yet it verifies the property you mention. For every $x\in\mathbb{R}$ we can take any open interval $I$ containing $x$, and let $f_{1}$ be any function in $F(I)$ (recall that $F(I)$ consists only of constant functions).

If $g\in F(I)$ and we let $h=g$ we have that $h$ is smooth of 1 real variable such that $g(y)=h(f_{1}(y))$ for all $y\in I$.

On the other hand, suppose that there is a smooth function of 1 real variable $h$ such that for a continuous $g:I\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ we have $g(y)=h(f_{1}(y))$ for all $y\in I$. Then since $f_{1}$ is constant, say $f_{1}\equiv c\in\mathbb{R}$, we get $g(y)=h(c)$ for all $y\in I$, i.e., $g\in F(I)$.

If you add the additional hypothesis that $\phi$ is locally invertible then the implication $\Leftarrow$ is true. Other hypotheses may also work.

Othe links to problems on that section of Bredon's book are this, this and this.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, John. Would you mind explaining why your counterexample works (more precisely, why the hypotheses are satisfied)? I assume you let $f = id$, as I see no other plausible candidate. But then it's not true that $g(p) = h(p)$ for some smooth $h$ implies that $g$ is locally constant. –  A.P. Aug 23 '13 at 15:49
    
@ Alex P. I edited my answer. I hope it helps. $f_{1}=id$ will not work. Just let $f_{1}$ be any constant function. –  John Aug 24 '13 at 1:21
    
Ah, excellent! I don't know why I didn't think of constant functions. Thank you very much, John. –  A.P. Aug 27 '13 at 14:20
    
No problem. I edited the question and added some links to questions related to the problems of the section you are reading. I am myself stuck on problem 5 p.71 (see the last link I added at the end of my answer) –  John Aug 27 '13 at 14:25
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.