Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

(I will phrase the question in terms of $\mathbb{R}^n$)

Is the following statement a standard well-known linear algebra fact that I can quote without proving? (Perhaps more importantly, is it even true?)

Notation that we will use:

$a_M(\lambda) =$ algebraic multiplicity of $\lambda$ for matrix/ linear map $M$.

$g_M(\lambda) =$ same for geometric multiplicity.


Let $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. Then

$\mathbb{R}^n = \textrm{ker}A \oplus \textrm{range}A \Leftrightarrow a_A(0) = g_A(0).$



share|cite|improve this question
I think you should precise your question. Do you want to know if as abstract vector spaces, $\mathbb{R}^n \simeq \textrm{ker}A \oplus \textrm{range}A$, or if $\mathbb{R}^n$ is the direct sum of its subspaces $\ker A$ and $\mathrm{range} A$? Note that in the second case, there is a canonical morphism $\ker A \oplus\mathrm{range} A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ and we can wonder wether it is an isomorphism or not. Dylan Moreland answers the first question. The second one is equivalent to $\ker A = \ker A^2$. – Plop Jun 19 '11 at 12:01
up vote 0 down vote accepted

The statement is indeed correct and essentially follows right from the definition.

The rank-nullity theorem tells us that ${\rm dim Ker} A + {\rm dim Im} A = {\rm dim} V$ so we only need to prove that ${\rm Ker} A \cap {\rm Im} A = 0$. But this is precisely the condition for the geometric multiplicity being equal to algebraic multiplicity.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.