Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $c$ a simplex such that it is the join of two of its faces, say $c=a\ast b$. Let $S$ be defined as $$ S=\left\{\sigma\in \partial(c')\big\vert \ \sigma \textrm{ has no vertex in } a\cup b\right\}$$ where $c'$ is the baricentric subdivision of $c$. I would like to show that $S$ is homotopic to a sphere.

Now, this is my idea, that I am not able to complete: a simplex $\sigma$ in $S$ can be written as a sequence of proper inclusions $$\sigma\equiv \alpha_0\subsetneq\ldots\subsetneq\alpha_k$$ such that the $\alpha_i$ are proper faces of $c$ and none of them is contained in $a\cup b$. If I'm not wrong, this space should be equal to the following: take the boundary of $c$ (which is a sphere) and subdivide it, obtaining a sphere again. Now remove $a$ and $b$ (which should be disjoint, as $c$ is the join of them) and "collapse" what you get over the maximum subcomplex that remains. This should be homotopic to a sphere with 2 points removed, so it should be again homotopic to a sphere.

Probably I'm completely wrong, but the other paths I've tried to follow led me to non-sense conclusions.

Thanks in advance, bye

share|cite|improve this question
"This should be homeomorphic to a sphere with 2 points removed, so it should be again homeomorphic to a sphere." -> You must be talking about some other definition of homeomorphic than the one I am familiar with because sphere with two points removed is a cylinder in my book, not a sphere... – Marek Jun 18 '11 at 11:32
Yes, you're right... sorry! I used "homeomorphic" instead of "homotopically equivalent"! I'm going to edit the text right now! – fatoddsun Jun 18 '11 at 12:27
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Consider the set $$ T \;=\; \{\sigma \in c' \mid \sigma\text{ has no vertices in }a\cup b\} $$ It is not hard to show that $T$ is homeomorphic with $a \times b$. For example, every line segment with one endpoint in $a$ and one endpoint in $b$ intersects a unique point of $T$, and this defines a map $a\times b \to T$.

Since $a$ and $b$ are simplices, it follows that $T$ is homeomorphic to a ball. The set $S$ you describe is the boundary of this ball, and is therefore homeomorphic to a a sphere.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.