Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider a complete metric compact space $X$. For each $x\in X$ we define a probability measure $T(\cdot|x)$ over a Borel sigma-algebra $\mathcal{B}(X)$. We call a set $A\subset X$ invariant if $T(A|x) = 1$ for all $x\in A$. Does it mean that if $A$ is invariant, the same holds for its closure?

I am especially interested in the case when $T$ is Feller continuous or strong Feller continuous.

More precisely, denote $$ \mathcal{P}f(x) = \int\limits_X f(y)T(dy|x) $$ and spaces $\mathcal{M}_b$ and $\mathcal{C}_b$ of measurable bounded and continuous bounded functions on $X$. Then Feller continuity means $f(x)\in \mathcal{C}_b \Rightarrow \mathcal{P}f(x)\in\mathcal{C}_b$ and strong Feller continuity means $f(x)\in \mathcal{M}_b \Rightarrow \mathcal{P}f(x)\in\mathcal{C}_b$.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

In general, no; consider a deterministic process on $\mathbb{R}$ which, when started from $x \in (-\infty, 0)$, moves left with constant speed, but when started from $x \in [0, +\infty)$ moves right. Then $(-\infty, 0)$ is invariant but $(-\infty, 0]$ is not.

If you want a compact space, you could use $[-1,1]$ instead and make the endpoints absorbing.

If $T$ is strong Feller, the answer is yes: if $A$ is invariant, then $T(A|x) = 1$ for $x \in A$. But $T(A | x) = \mathcal{P}1_A$ is continuous, so $T(A|x) = 1$ for $x \in \bar{A}$. Thus for $x \in \bar{A}$, $T(\bar{A} | x) \ge T(A|x) = 1$.

If $T$ is Feller, the answer is also yes. By Urysohn's lemma we may find a sequence $f_n$ of bounded continuous functions with $0 \le f_n \le 1$, $f_n = 1$ on $\bar{A}$, and $f_n \downarrow 1_{\bar{A}}$. For $x \in A$, we have $\mathcal{P}f_n(x) \ge \mathcal{P}1_A(x) = 1$, and since $\mathcal{P}f_n$ is continuous, $\mathcal{P} f_n(x) \ge 1$ for all $x \in \bar{A}$. But by monotone convergence, $\mathcal{P} f_n(x) \downarrow \mathcal{P} 1_{\bar{A}}(x) = T(\bar{A} | x)$, so $T(\bar{A} | x) = 1$ for all $x \in \bar{A}$.

share|improve this answer
    
@Nate: I guess that this example can be also obtained for compact sets as I want? Also I am not sure that this process is even (weak) Feller continuous. –  Ilya Jun 17 '11 at 13:34
    
@Gortaur: Sure, if you want compact, you could use $[-\infty, \infty]$ instead. (Or $[-1,1]$ and make the endpoints absorbing.) You are right that this process is not Feller. –  Nate Eldredge Jun 17 '11 at 15:00
    
@Nate: since you're using this notions of "absorbing" points, maybe you are also familiar with absorbing sets which I call invariant in my question? –  Ilya Jun 17 '11 at 15:15
    
@Nate: could you help me to understand how does this sequence is constructed from Urysohn's lemma? I guess that we made a sequence of closed sets $B_n$ to put $f_n$ to be an Urysohn's function of $\bar{A}$ and $B_n$, but I am not sure which sets $B_n$ can be used and why $f_n \downarrow 1_{\bar{A}}$? –  Ilya Jun 18 '11 at 14:11
    
@Gortaur: Actually, in this case we could do something easier: set $g(x) = \min(d(x, \bar{A}), 1)$, and let $f_n(x) = (1-g(x))^n$. –  Nate Eldredge Jun 19 '11 at 14:51
show 8 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.