Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My books introduce the collection $\mathcal{F}(X,\mathbb{R})$ of all real-value functions defined on a non-empty set $X$ together with the operations satisfies the axiom of a real linear vector space. Firstly I don't really understand the significant of investigating the functions inside $\mathcal{F}$. Are those functions more special than the others? Also, at the other chapter about metric and normed space in my book, it said:

We shall frequently want to study classes of functions with certain other properties such as boundedness, continuity, etc. We shall use the following result from linear algebra: Let $\mathcal{A}(X,{R})$ be a non-empty subcollection (subspace) of $\mathcal{F}(X,\mathbb{R})$ satisfying the following two properties:

(1) If $f,g\in\mathcal{A}(X,\mathbb{R})$, then the sum $f+g\in\mathcal{A}(X,\mathbb{R})$

(2) If $f\in\mathcal{A}(X,\mathbb{R})$ and $k\in\mathbb{R}$, then the scalar multiple $kf\in\mathcal{A}(X,\mathbb{R})$

Then $\mathcal{A}(X,\mathbb{R})$ is, itself, a linear vector space.

I want to ask that why it is correct. For example it does not define the zero vector(function). I try to define it as $\mathbf{0}=0*f$ while it satisfies the second property, so the zero vector(function) is inside $\mathcal{A}(X,\mathbb{R})$. However in that way, it give rise to my next question: Since actually $\mathcal{F}(X,{R})$ is a non-empty subcollection (subspace) of $\mathcal{F}(X,\mathbb{R})$ itself. Then if it satisfies that two properties, $\mathcal{F}(X,\mathbb{R})$ is a linear vector space. In that way why it is needed to satisfy so many axiom (8 total) in order to check whether it is a vector space?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Recall that given a field $K$, a $K$-vector space $V$ is a set with an operation $+$ and an action $(\;\cdot\;):K\times V\to V$ such that $(V,+)$ is an abelian group, and the action satisfies $$\begin{align} a\cdot (v+w)&=a\cdot v+a\cdot w\\(a+_Kb)\cdot w&=a\cdot w+b\cdot w\\1_K\cdot v&=v\\ (a\cdot_K b)\cdot v&=a\cdot(b\cdot v)\end{align}$$

where I used the subcript $K$ to denote the operation or element is from the field $K$.

Let $V$ be a $K$-vector space and $S$ a subset. Since it is a subset in inherits all the properties (the axioms) which you have already checked. The three additional checkpoints

$$\begin{align}\tag 1 &S\neq\varnothing\\ \tag 2 x,y\in S&\implies x+y\in S\\ \tag 3\lambda\in K\;,\;x\in &S\implies \lambda x\in S\end{align}$$

ensure that $S$ is a vector space in its own right. Condition $(2)$ ensures $+$ is an operation $+:S\to S$ that is, that $S$ is "closed under $+$", while $(3)$ ensures $\left(\;\cdot\;\right)$ is an action $\left(\;\cdot\;\right) :K\times S\to S$. One can alternatively use the equivalent

$$\begin{align}\tag 1 &0\in S\\ \tag 2 x,y\in S&\implies x+y\in S\\ \tag 3\lambda\in K\;,\;x\in &S\implies \lambda x\in S\end{align}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

You can't apply the result you have quoted until you have proved that $F(X,\mathbb{R})$ is a vector space first. In order to do that, you need to check all the axioms.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.