Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose that $G$ is a compact Hausdorff topological group and that $g\in G$. Consider the set $A=\{g^n : n=0,1,2,\ldots\}$ and let $\bar{A}$ denote the closure of $A$ in $G$.

Is it true that $\mathbf{\bar{A}}$ is a subgroup of $\mathbf{G}$?

From continuity of multiplication and the fact that $A\cdot A\subseteq A$ it is clear that $\bar{A}\cdot\bar{A}\subseteq\bar{A}$. therefore, $a,b\in \bar{A}$ yields $a\cdot b\in \bar{A}$. However, I am having trouble showing that inverses of elements in $\bar{A}$ are also in $\bar{A}$.

share|improve this question
add comment

4 Answers

It is sufficient to show that $g^{-1} \in \overline{A}$, then $\langle g\rangle \subset \overline{A}$, and $\overline{A}$ is the closure of a subgroup, hence a subgroup.

If $g$ has finite order, it is trivial that $g^{-1} \in A = \overline{A}$, so let's suppose that $g^n \neq 1$ for $n \neq 0$.

If $g^{-1} \notin \overline{A}$, then there is a symmetric open neighbourhood $U$ of $1$ with $g^{-1}U \cap A = \varnothing$.

Then, for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$, we have $g^nU \cap A = \{g^n\}$. Otherwise, if $g^k \in g^nU$ for $k \neq n$, by symmetry of $U$ we can assume that $k > n$, then $g^{k-n-1} \in g^{-1}U\cap A$, which contradicts the choice of $U$.

Now, $A$ is an infinite set, hence has an accumulation point $p$, since $G$ is compact. Let $V$ a symmetric open neighbourhood of $1$ with $V\cdot V \subset U$. Since $p$ is an accumulation point of $A$, $pV$ contains at least two points $g^k$ and $g^n$, $n \neq k$ of $A$. But then $g^k \in g^nU \cap A$. That contradicts the above, hence $g^{-1} \in \overline{A}$.

share|improve this answer
add comment
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Let $B=\{g^{n}:n\in\mathbb{Z}\}$. Clearly $\bar{B}$ is also a subgroup of $G$.

If $1$ is an isolated point in $\bar{B}$ then all points of $\bar{B}$ are isolated, which means that $\bar{B}$ is compact and discrete, and hence finite. Thus, $g^{n}=1$ for some $n$ and so $\bar{A}$ is a subgroup of $G$.

On the other hand, if $1$ is a limit point in $\bar{B}$ then for any symmetric neighborhood $V$ of $1$ there is a positive integer $n$ such that $g^{n}\in V$ ($n>0$ is possible since $V$ is symmetric). Then $g^{n-1}\in(g^{-1}V)\cap A$, and since the $g^{-1}V$ form a neighborhood basis at $g^{-1}$ we have that $g^{-1}\in \bar{A}$. This means that $\bar{A}=\bar{B}$ and so $\bar{A}$ is a subgroup of $G$.

share|improve this answer
    
Very nice. ${}$ –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jul 26 '13 at 0:29
add comment

Let me suppose your group is second-countable, so that we need only worry abour sequences.

It is enough to show that for every $g\in G$ we have that $g^{-1}$ is an element of the closure of $\{g^i:i\geq0\}$.

So pick any convergent subsequence of $(g^i)_{i\geq0}$, say $(g^{n_i})_{i\geq0}$, and let $h\in G$ be its limit. Then $(g^{n_i-n_{i-1}-1})_{i\geq1}$ is another subsequence. What is its limit?

share|improve this answer
    
The general case follows similarly. –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jul 25 '13 at 22:03
    
Thanks, +1 to your answer –  John Jul 26 '13 at 1:16
add comment

I am editing what I said before which mistakenly assumed $A$ above is a subgroup.

Here is the answer. Assume that $g$ is not nilpotent (in that case there is nothing to show).

Claim: The point {1} is not isolated in $\bar{A}$.

The claim implies that there is a non-trivial sequence in $\bar{A}$ hence in $A$ which converges to 1. Then writing this sequence as $\{ g^{k_{i}} \}$ we get $\lbrace { g^{k_{i}-1} \rbrace} \rightarrow g^{-1}$. Hence $g^{-1} \in \bar{A}$ and thus $\bar{A}$ is the closure of the subgroup generated by $A$ and hence is a subgroup (which is a simple fact).

To prove the claim. The set $A$ has atleast one limit point (because of compactness). Call it $x$. Then for any sequence $\{ g^{n_{k}} \} \rightarrow x$. Hence $x^{-1}.g^{n_{k}} \rightarrow 1.!$

share|improve this answer
    
How does this help answer the question? –  Chris Eagle Jul 25 '13 at 21:51
    
If $x=1$ in the additive group $\mathbb R$... –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jul 25 '13 at 21:51
    
@ChrisEagle : I apologize, I thought A is a subgroup but I now notice that it is not. It is a semi-group. –  DBS Jul 25 '13 at 21:53
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.