Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know of the sum of the natural logarithms of the factors of n! , but would like to know if any others exist.

share|cite|improve this question
There's many for example: $n!=(n!-7)+7$:) – user63181 Jul 25 '13 at 4:21
Hmm. Given that an integral is an "infinite sum", I think $\Gamma(n+1)=n!$ infinitesimally works. – 1015 Jul 25 '13 at 4:42

13 Answers 13

up vote 40 down vote accepted

This one is pretty important: $$n! = \sum_{\sigma\in S_n} 1$$

Edit: As Arkamis explains, $S_n$ is the symmetric group on $n$ letters. Each $\sigma\in S_n$ is a permutation on the set $[1,2,\ldots,n]$. Since $S_n$ is a finite set, we may sum a function over it, and the sum of the constant function $f(\sigma)=1$ is just the size of the set, which is $|S_n| = n!$.

Arguably, summing a constant function is cheating. Here's one way to raise the stakes. Let $B_n$ be the set of $n\times n$ integer matrices $A$ such that every sum of a subset of entries from $A$ is in $[0,n]$. Then:

$$n!=\sum_{A\in B_n}|\det A|$$

This is the same identity in a more interesting disguise. Every $n\times n$ permutation matrix $A$ is a member of $B_n$, and $\det A = \pm 1$. On the other hand, if $A\in B_n$ is not a permutation matrix, then you can prove that $\det A = 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic - but I don't know what that sum means, can you please explain? – zerosofthezeta Jul 25 '13 at 4:37
@Euclid It means that the order of the symmetric group $S_n$ is $n!$. $\sigma \in S_n$ means "each element $\sigma$ in the group $S_n$, of which there are $n!$. – Emily Jul 25 '13 at 4:38
Nice, haha$\left . \right .$ – Thomas Jul 25 '13 at 5:15

Lots of good answers, but the answer is quite easily, "yes."

Integer multiplication is repeated addition.

$n!$ is $n$ groups of $(n-1)!$ objects, so $n! = \sum_{k=1}^n (n-1)!$.

Then, $(n-1)!$ is $n-1$ groups of $(n-2)!$ objects, so $n! = \sum_{k_1=1}^n \sum_{k_2 = 1}^{n-1} (n-2)!$, and so on.


$$4! = \sum_{k_1 = 1}^4 3! = 3!+3!+3!+3! = 4\cdot 3!.$$ $$\begin{align*} 4! &= \sum_{k_1=1}^4 \sum_{k_2=1}^3 2! \\ &= \sum_{k_1=1}^4 2!+2!+2! \\ &= 2!+2!+2! + 2!+2!+2! + 2!+2!+2! + 2!+2!+2! \\ &= 12\cdot 2! \\ &=4\cdot 3\cdot 2!. \end{align*}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

$n! = e^{ \sum_{k = 1}^n \ln (k)}$

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, but I addressed this one in my question... – zerosofthezeta Sep 14 '13 at 7:39

$$n! = 1 + \sum_{k=1}^n (k-1) (k-1)!$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Sure, for $n\ge 1$ we have $$n!=\fbox{$(n-1)\times (n-1)!$} + \fbox{$(n-1)!$}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

If you really want, we can write $n!$ using this infinite series

share|cite|improve this answer
I doubt that the series converges - it is probably an asymptotic series. – marty cohen Jul 25 '13 at 4:30
The series "at $n=\infty$" is an asymptotic series. The series "at $n=0$" and the series "at $n=-1$" have radius of convergence $1$. – Robert Israel Jul 25 '13 at 4:35

$$n!=\prod_{p<n}p^{\sum_{k=1}^\infty\lfloor{n\over p^k}\rfloor}$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Can you provide an example for a small number like 8? – zerosofthezeta Aug 5 '13 at 3:51
This comes from prime factorization of $n!$. Any $p^e<n$ will divide $n!$. And $e=\sum_{k=1}^\infty\lfloor{n\over p^k}\rfloor.$ – Kunnysan Aug 5 '13 at 4:29
$8! = 2^{4+2+1} 3^{2} 5^{1} 7^{1}$. – Slade Dec 16 '13 at 7:34

Another combinatorially important sum: $\displaystyle n! = \sum_{k=0}^n\bigl[\begin{smallmatrix}n\\k \end{smallmatrix}\bigr]$, where $\displaystyle\bigl[\begin{smallmatrix}n\\k \end{smallmatrix}\bigr]$ is the (unsigned) Stirling symbol of the first kind, which can be defined (for instance) by the relation $x(x+1)\ldots(x+n-1) = \sum_{k=0}^n\bigl[\begin{smallmatrix}n\\k \end{smallmatrix}\bigr] x^k$. (And of course, by setting $x=1$ in this relation we get the initial sum.) The combinatorial significance is that $\bigl[\begin{smallmatrix}n\\k \end{smallmatrix}\bigr]$ counts the number of permutations of the numbers $1..n$ with $k$ distinct cycles; the relation $\displaystyle n! = \sum_{k=0}^n\bigl[\begin{smallmatrix}n\\k \end{smallmatrix}\bigr]$ thus says that the total number of permutations is just the sum over all $k$ of the number of permutations into $k$ cycles.

share|cite|improve this answer

I have found the following formula: $$n!=\sum_{k=2}^{n+1}(-1)^{n+1-k}\binom{n+1}{k}\sum_{i=1}^{k-1}i^{n},\ n\in N.$$

share|cite|improve this answer

I know this question is old, but I found it googling for summation definitions of the factorial function, and thought a good answer would be the following formula, which I discovered several years ago and I haven't seen anywhere else:

$n!=\displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^n \binom{n}{k} (-1)^{n+k} k^n$

I never took the time to find a proof, but it certainly works. It would be interesting if anyone with decent math skills (that is, better than me) could shed some light on it.

share|cite|improve this answer

$$\frac{(n+2)!}{2} = (n+1)! + \sum_{i=1}^n i\,n!$$

share|cite|improve this answer

$$(v+1)! = 1 + \sum_{k=1}^v (v-k-1)! (v-k)^2$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Explaining why this formula is true would be a good improvement to this answer. – apnorton Jan 27 '15 at 20:55
Sorry i have dyslexia ,change the left side of the equation with ν! – kostas Jan 28 '15 at 3:52

Here's a good reference document from a few years back: Factorials as sums by Roberto Anglani and Margherita Barile.

In this paper we give an additive representation of the factorial, which can be proven by a simple quick analytical argument. We also present some generalizations, which are linked, on the one hand to an arithmetical theorem proven by Euler (decomposition of primes as the sum of two squares), and, on the other hand, to modern combinatorics (Stirling numbers).

share|cite|improve this answer
While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. – Edward Jiang Jan 28 '15 at 4:35

protected by Daniel Fischer Jan 27 '15 at 22:04

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.