Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Very elementary math question here in regards to my discrete math class. I've got a problem here that says...

"Compute the following":

$$\sum_{j=1}^n \frac{1}{j(j+1)}$$

What on earth does it mean to "compute" this? I mean, without any values, does that just mean to find another way of re-arranging the components to get a formula of equal value, just in a different form?

I did some iterations by hand and found that for n=4, we end up with:


So it looks like each iteration just increases the denominator by the previous increase's next even number:

$\frac{1}{2} \rightarrow \frac{1}{6}$ (increase by 4)

$\frac{1}{6} \rightarrow \frac{1}{12}$ (increase by 6)

$\frac{1}{12} \rightarrow \frac{1}{20}$ (increase by 8)

So I see the pattern. Does that mean for example that I could re-write the above sigma summation as a "rule" for making the sequence?

share|cite|improve this question
I think your teacher means to say:express the sum solely in terms of $n$. – Ravi Jul 23 '13 at 2:19
Write the result as an expression depending on $n$. $n = 1 \leadsto \frac12$, $n = 2 \leadsto \frac23$, $n = 3 \leadsto \frac34$. See a pattern? – Daniel Fischer Jul 23 '13 at 2:20
Yep, you can rearrange it. Try writing the sum in the form $\frac{A}{j}+\frac{B}{j+1}$. Figure out A and B, then you'll see that the sum telescopes – Chris Dugale Jul 23 '13 at 2:21
up vote 4 down vote accepted

You’re supposed to find a closed form expressing that sum as a function of $n$, one that does not include a summation. An example that you’ve probably seen is the formula for the sum of the first $n$ positive integers:


You’re supposed to do something similar here. Here’s a hint to get you started:


share|cite|improve this answer

You are not given a specific value like $1,2,68$ but your summation depends $n$ , hence your result will be a function of $n$. It's always a good idea to get your hands dirty and look for patterns but in this case there is a genral rule:

If you have a summation with a polynomial wich can be factorized at the denomnator ( in this case: $j(j+1)=j^2+j \ \ $) it is a good idea to split the terms in $l$ parts where $l$ is the number of factors of the polynomial. In our case $l=2$ as you can see.

$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \dfrac1{k(k+1)}=\dfrac{A}{k}+\dfrac{B}{k+1} \ $

With a little computation you will find out : $A=1$ and $B=-1$

now do you see a pattern here ?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.