Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My book is demanding that I show that the Maclaurin polynomial for $\ln(1+x)$ is

$$T_n (x) = x - \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{3}+ \cdots + (-1)^{n-1} \frac{x^n}{n}$$

I don't think this is true at all actually. Following the given formula for finding this

$$f(a) + \frac{f'(a)}{1!}(x)+\cdots$$

well just those two terms fail the test.

$a$ is zero so $\ln0$ is undefined. For the next part I get 1 which is also not on here. What is going on here? My book is suggesting that this is correct but I don't see that.

share|improve this question
3  
$f(x) \ne \ln(x)$, but rather $f(x) = \ln(x+1)$. Plugging in $a=0$ to $f(x)$ does not return $\ln(0)$. –  anorton Jul 21 '13 at 21:35

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Although $a$ is zero, that doesn't mean that $f(a)$ isn't defined. Recall that $f(x) := ln(1 + x)$, so that $f(0) = ln(1) = 0$.

Similarly, $f'(x)) = \frac{1}{x + 1}$, so $f'(0) = 1$.

--

Edit: For clarification, the formula for a Maclaurin series states that

$$f(x) = f(0) + \frac{f'(0)}{1!}x + \frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 + ...$$

In this case, $f(x)$ was defined as

$f(x) = ln(1 + x)$

Hence, we see that $f(0) = 0$, $f'(0) = 1$, and $f''(0) = -1$. Thus,

$$f(x) = 0 + \frac{1}{1} x + \frac{-1}{2} x^2 + ... = x - \frac{x^2}{2} + ...$$

as was desired.

share|improve this answer
    
ln1 is similarly bad since I need to get an x not a one, there is no 1 in the thing I need. –  Paul the Pirate Jul 21 '13 at 21:34
    
The computation ln(1) = 0 implies that the constant term in the series is zero. Which is exactly what you want. –  user61527 Jul 21 '13 at 21:37
    
But there is no 1 in the series. –  Paul the Pirate Jul 21 '13 at 21:38
    
@Paul Note that x = 1x. Read the formula for the coefficients again: the coeff of x^k is just $f^k(0) / k!$, so the coefficient of $x = x^1$ is $f'(0)/1! = 1/1 = 1$. –  user61527 Jul 21 '13 at 21:40
    
But isn't x defined as 0? –  Paul the Pirate Jul 21 '13 at 21:41

Your book is correct. $f(0) = \ln{(1+0)} = \ln{1} = 0$. As for the other coefficients,

$$f'(0) = \frac{1}{1+x}|_{x=0} = 1$$

$$f''(0) = -\frac{1}{(1+x)^2}|_{x=0} = -1$$

etc. You can easily bulid this up and verify your book's formula.

share|improve this answer
    
Apparently not, but thanks for thinking so. –  Paul the Pirate Jul 21 '13 at 21:35
    
@PaulthePirate: sure you can. Just apply the formula $$\frac{d}{dx} (1+x)^{-n} = -\frac{n}{(1+x)^{-n-1}}$$ –  Ron Gordon Jul 21 '13 at 21:36
    
I really don't understand this, it is too confusing since I have x and a and f(a). f(a) gives x in the fucntion it's value and a points to zero as defined by the Maclaurin function right? –  Paul the Pirate Jul 21 '13 at 21:40

Useing the geometric series formula,

$$\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}x^k=\frac{x^n-1}{x-1}$$

Under the substitution $x:-t$, and then integrating with respect to $t$ from $0$ to $x$ we get, $$\ln(x+1)=\sum_{k=1}^n(-1)^{k-1}\frac{x^k}{k}+(-1)^n\int_{0}^x\frac{t^n}{t+1} dt$$

But, $$(-1)^n\int_{0}^x\frac{t^n}{t+1}dt<\int_{0}^xt^{n-1}=\frac{x^n}{n}$$

So we have, $$|\ln(x+1)-T_n(x)|<\frac{x^n}{n}$$

And if $|x|<1$, $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{x^n}{n}=0$

share|improve this answer
    
Is it wrong to use the Taylor Polynomial formula with a = 0? –  Paul the Pirate Jul 21 '13 at 21:48

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.