Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I find myself becoming confused whenever I try to think about this. In the following, $K$ is a field.

An elliptic curve $\mathcal{C}$ is defined to be a nonsingular projective cubic curve over $K$, with a $K$-rational point. Now, I am told that the specified $K$-rational point is always the identity $\mathbf{o}$, which is the point at infinity, but I don't understand this. Isn't a $K$-rational point by definition supposed to be an affine point? I thought that $K$-rational means an element of $\mathbb{A}^2(K)$. The point $\mathbf{o}$ is simply not in affine space!

Another problem I have, which might stem from the above misunderstanding, is what the Mordell-Weil subgroup $\mathcal{C}(K)$ actually is. I understand that the points on $\mathcal{C}$ form a group under the usual law. But if the point at infinity is $K$-rational, and clearly all other points are affine and on a curve over $K$, then isn't the Mordell-Weil group just going to be all the points on $\mathcal{C}$? How is it ever a proper subgroup?

share|cite|improve this question

For ease of exposition, consider an elliptic curve with Weierstrass equation $y^2=x^3 + ax +b$. Note that the elliptic curve is actually the projective curve defined by

$y^2 z = x^3 + ax^2 z + b z^3$

If we look at the affine patch where $z \neq 0$, we get back the Weierstrass equation I wrote down originally.

If we look instead at the intersection of our curve with the line $z=0$, we see that the only (projective) point coming from this patch is our point at infinity $\cal{O}$=$[0,1,0]$, and certainly $0,1 \in K$ so this point is K-rational.

Edit: The definition of a K-rational point in $\mathbf{P}^n$ is a point $[x_0,\ldots, x_1] \in \mathbf{P}^n$ such that all $x_i \in K$. That's why $\cal{O}$ above is K-rational.

Not all points on an elliptic curve are K-rational. For example, consider the elliptic curve over $\mathbf{Q}$ defined by the Weierstrass equation

$E:y^2 = x^3 + x$

Then the point $[1,\sqrt{2},1] \in E$ is clearly not $\mathbf{Q}$-rational.

share|cite|improve this answer
Right, okay. So being $K$-rational refers in this case to projective space... I think I was looking at definitions in affine space and thinking that the two were identical. But then, as for my second question, doesn't this mean that the Mordell-Weil group is just all points on the curve? – Sputnik Jun 8 '11 at 19:56
No, see my further addition. (Sorry for all the edits!) The Mordell-Weil group is the group $E(K)$. In the example at the bottom of my post, I exhibited a curve E and a point which was in $E(\mathbf{\bar{Q}})$ but not in $E(\mathbf{Q})$. – Jeff Jun 8 '11 at 20:04
I think I get it now. So the idea is that the group law, as originally defined, applies to all points on the curve regardless of whether they are in $K$; so in your example, you can still 'add' points with irrational (or complex) coordinates. The M-W subgroup just refers to the ones that actually are in $K$. – Sputnik Jun 8 '11 at 20:17
Exactly! =D A nice elliptic curve has lots of points in general...if you look at the points over $\mathbf{C}$, they form a torus, in fact, and the points on this torus have a group structure. But if we look only at points over $\mathbf{Q}$, we get a subgroup with far fewer points, and in fact the M-W theorem tells us that this subgroup is finitely generated. – Jeff Jun 8 '11 at 20:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.