Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In an exam recently, I was asked to find the minimal number of contractible sets covering $\mathbb{CP}^3$ by considering the cup-product on relative cohomology. Is there nice a way of doing this, either using the proposed approach or some other?

Note: I am aware of (the existence of) the Lusternik–Schnirelmann category, but since this was not part of the curriculum, I doubt that we were supposed to use it.

share|cite|improve this question
LS category only gives you an upper bound, anyways, and you are asking for the minimal number. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jun 8 '11 at 18:53
@Mariano: Could you elaborate? If I am not misreading the Wikipedia article, the LS category is exactly the number I am looking for. – Raeder Jun 8 '11 at 23:33
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Indeed, there is a solution that uses the fact that cup-length is an obvious lower bound for the L-S category. Namely, if $X$ is covered by $n$ contractible sets $U_i$, multiplication $\tilde H(X)^{\otimes n}\to\tilde H(X)$ factors through $\tilde H(X)^{\otimes n}=\otimes H(X,U_i)\to H(X,\bigcup U_i)=H(X,X)=0$. (Perhaps, it's what was expected.)

share|cite|improve this answer
What happens at your first equality sign? Assuming we have this, then the lower bound is the cup-length, in this case $3$, and we have the obvious four $\{z_i\neq 0\}$ contractible sets as an open cover - how do we go from $4$ to $3$ or prove that this isn't possible? – Raeder Jun 8 '11 at 23:33
@Raeder 1) Since $U_i$ is contractible, $H(X,U_i)=H(X,pt)=\tilde H(X)$. 2) Lower bond we get is that $CP^3$ can't be covered by 3 contractible sets (since there is a generator in $u\in H^1(CP^3)$ s.t. $u^3\ne0$), so it solves the problem. – Grigory M Jun 9 '11 at 6:28
Thanks for the answer and the explanation! – Raeder Jun 9 '11 at 7:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.