Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This may seem absurd but what is wrong with the next reasoning about $n$th roots of unit?. For $k,l\in\mathbb Z$ such that $0 \leq k < l \leq n-1$: $$ e^{2\pi i k/n} = (e^{\pi i})^{2 k /n} \overset{\text{Euler's identity}}{=} (-1)^{2 k /n} = ((-1)^2)^{k/n} = 1^{k/n} = 1 $$ so $e^{2\pi i k /n} = e^{2\pi i l /n}$ since it is the same reasoning for $l$. Thanks for your help, I actually don't see what is wrong.

share|cite|improve this question
For non-integral exponents, how do you define the power? The identity $a^{bc} = (a^b)^c$ doesn't unconditionally hold. – Daniel Fischer Jul 6 '13 at 21:41
@DanielFischer The use of the letters $n$ and $k$ usually imply that both $n$ and $k$ are integers. – Fly by Night Jul 6 '13 at 21:45
@FlybyNight: he is actually "proving" that $z_k=1$. – Martin Argerami Jul 6 '13 at 21:49
@MartinArgerami Indeed he is. Well-spotted. – Fly by Night Jul 6 '13 at 21:50
@FlybyNight No, but then I don't see how the fact that $n$ and $k$ are usually used for integers is relevant at all. – Daniel Fischer Jul 6 '13 at 22:02
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Here is a simpler example: $$ -1=(-1)^{\frac22}=\left((-1)^{2}\right)^{\frac12}=1^{\frac12}=1. $$ Do you see the problem here? The problem is that $1^{\frac12}$ is the solution of the equation $x^2=1$ which is not unique and you are choosing the wrong solution.
Is like we are having a function $f$ which is not 1-1 (in my example $f=x^2$), lets say that $f(a_1)=f(a_2)=r$ and $a_1\neq a_2$, and we are arguing that $$a_1=f^{-1}\left(f(a_1)\right)=f^{-1}(r)=a_2$$ which is wrong.
In your case you are using the function $f=x^n$ to deduce that $f^{-1}(1)=1^{\frac1n}=1$ which is wrong. One of the solutions of $f^{-1}(1)$ is $e^{2\pi i k/n}$ and you are choosing $f^{-1}(1)=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

There is no canonical way of defining non-integer powers of complex numbers other than the non-negative reals. So the problem lies when you want to write $z^{st}=(z^s)^t$. You are actually providing an example that such equality does not hold in general. To make the example even simpler, you could have written $$ e^{2i\pi r}=(e^{2\pi i})^r=1^r=1. $$ This of course not true, and it just shows that the relation does not hold.

share|cite|improve this answer
Could you go into more detail please? What is a non-positive complex number? Do you mean complex numbers with a non-positive real part? – Fly by Night Jul 6 '13 at 21:55
In the case $(e^{2\pi i k/n})^n$ with $k\in\mathbb Z^+\cup\{0\}$ it holds, right? Should clarify that in your example $r\in\mathbb R\setminus(\mathbb Z^+ \cup \{0\})$? – Spark Sm. Jul 6 '13 at 22:11
@FlybyNight: yes. – Martin Argerami Jul 6 '13 at 22:11
@SparkSm. When $r$ is a positive integer, the equality I wrote is true. When it is not, it isn't. The point is that if you assume that you can do $z^{st}=(z^s)^t$ you get the equality I wrote, which is false in most cases. – Martin Argerami Jul 6 '13 at 22:13
@Martin, "the complex numbers are an ordered field"? Not according to the definitions with which I am familiar. I hate to cite Wikipedia as an authority, but it's all I can access right now: – Gerry Myerson Jul 7 '13 at 9:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.