Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

how to compare $ \sin(19^{2013})$ and $\cos (19^{2013})$ or even find their value range with normal calculator?

I can take $2\pi k= 19^{2013} \to \ln(k)= 2013 \ln(19)- \ln(2 \pi)=5925.32 \to k= 2.089 \times 10^{5925}$, but it useless.(I can get final answer with WolframAlpha but it is not allowed.)

Any hint? thanks!

share|improve this question
3  
What's the source of the problem? I don't think the abstract algebra tag fits. –  Tyler Jul 3 '13 at 2:40
3  
How do you define 'value range'? Obviously sin and cos will be between -1 and 1, but to get any more information than that you'll need to know $\pi$ to roughly 2500 places or so... –  Steven Stadnicki Jul 3 '13 at 2:44
1  
@Tyler,it is radian, BTW, it is a high school exec and mod is not taught. –  chenbai Jul 3 '13 at 3:19
3  
Is the angle intended to be in radians or degrees? If it is in degrees modding by 360 solves it easily. –  Spencer Jul 3 '13 at 3:55
1  
$19^2 = 360+1$. –  Lord Soth Jul 3 '13 at 4:04
show 13 more comments

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

To find the sine and cosine, you'll need to reduce the angle ($19^{2013} \approx 1.352 \times 10^{2574}$) modulo $2\pi$. So, for reasonable accuracy, you'll need about 2600 digits of $\pi$. Fortunately, the first 100 000 or even million digits are readily accessible online.

It happens that $19^{2013} \approx 1.2329141525482654$ modulo $2\pi$, so:

  • $\sin(19^{2013}) \approx \sin(1.2329141525482654) \approx 0.9434588183383549$
  • $\cos(19^{2013}) \approx \cos(1.2329141525482654) \approx 0.3314897556480367$

All you need is a programming language that supports arbitrary-precision rational arithmetic, and a way of obtaining lots of digits of $\pi$. A normal TI-89 calculator will provide the former; the hard part is implementing an algorithm for the latter. But that's a topic for another question.

share|improve this answer
1  
I'd say that's cheating :) –  nbubis Jul 3 '13 at 6:18
1  
Overkill much? :p –  Thomas Jul 3 '13 at 6:25
    
Woo, that is very interesting and nice answer.(+1) so it seems that I have to learn some programming if only with the calculator. I will wait another day to see some surprising answers to post. –  chenbai Jul 3 '13 at 6:53
    
Both Mathematica and Maple count that: see the Mathematica output exported as a PDF. –  user64494 Jul 3 '13 at 19:10
    
@user64494: I get a "file not found" error. –  Dan Jul 5 '13 at 6:44
add comment

If $19^{2013}$ were measured in degrees we could use a simple trick.

$19$ is one more than $18$ which is a multiple of $6$. This means that any power of $19$ is also $1$ more than a multiple of $6$, in particular $19^2 = 361$

$19^2$ being $1$ more than a multiple of $360$ tells us that any even power of $19$ will be 1 more than a multiple of $360$. In particular we can conclude that $19^{2012}$ is one more than a multiple of $360$.

What does that mean? It means that if we travel $19^{2012}$ degrees around the unit circle we will just end up at the $1$ degree tick mark.

$19^{2013}$ is just $19^{2012}$ $19$ times. This means we would make the trip described above $19$ times each time ending up one tick further than the last time meaning that we would finish at $19$ degrees. In other words $19$ degrees is located at the same position of the unit circle as $19^{2013}$.

If you've never worked with modular arithmetic you may not understand why $19^2 = 360 + 1$ implies that $19^{2012} = k \cdot 360+1$.

To see this consider powers of $(360+1)$.

$$360+1$$ $$ (360+1)^2 = 360^2 + 2\cdot360 + 1$$ $$ (360+1)^3 = 360^3 + 3^360^2 + 3*360 + 1$$ $$ \vdots$$ $$ (360+1)^n = 360^n + n *360^{n-1} + \cdots + n * 360 + 1 $$

Notice the result is always one more than a multiple of $360$.

share|improve this answer
1  
thanks ,Spencer.(+1).Now I am waiting the solution for radians. –  chenbai Jul 3 '13 at 4:25
    
No problem :). I'm not sure how to solve it in raidans yet, but I will try to figure it out. –  Spencer Jul 3 '13 at 4:30
    
+1 nice solution –  Ovi Jul 3 '13 at 7:49
    
There is no easy way to answer in radians; it is a variation of the famous "problem that stumped Feynman", to calculate $\tan 10^{100}$ to within ten percent. –  MJD Jul 3 '13 at 17:17
    
@MJD,thanks, following your comments, I just learn the story of Feynman that some one post it in the answer of SE also. –  chenbai Jul 4 '13 at 1:31
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.