Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A classmate consulted me this problem, after a few moment's thought I found it was difficult, so I wish to try my luck here.

Let $z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4\in \mathbb{C}$ such that $|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2=|z_3|^2+|z_4|^2=1$. How to show $$(1-|z_1|^p)^{1/p}\le(1-|z_3|^p)^{1/p}+(1-|z_1\overline{z}_3+z_2\overline{z}_4|^p)^{1/p}, $$ where $p\ge2$ is an integer?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Suppose we fix $w_1 = |z_1|$ and $w_3 = |z_3|$. In order to maximize $|z_1\overline{z}_3 + z_2\overline{z}_4|$, we need that the arguments of $z_1\overline{z}_3$ and $z_2\overline{z}_4$ be the same, and in that case the value will be $|z_1||z_3| + |z_2||z_4|$. So we can rewrite the inequality in an equivalent form: $$ (1-w_1^p)^{1/p} \leq (1-w_3^p)^{1/p} + (1-(w_1w_3 + \sqrt{(1-w_1^2)(1-w_3^2)})^p)^{1/p}. $$ Equivalently, $$ |(1-w_1^p)^{1/p} - (1-w_3^p)^{1/p}| \leq (1-(w_1w_3 + \sqrt{(1-w_1^2)(1-w_3^2)})^p)^{1/p}. $$ Writing $w_1 = \sin \alpha$ and $w_3 = \sin \beta$, this is the same as $$ |(1-(\sin \alpha)^p)^{1/p} - (1-(\sin \beta)^p)^{1/p}| \leq (1 - (\cos (\alpha-\beta))^p)^{1/p}. $$ Here $0 \leq \alpha,\beta \leq \pi/2$.

That's as far as I got.

share|improve this answer
    
How did you get the $+$ in the expressions on the left hand side? –  Raskolnikov Jun 5 '11 at 19:25
    
Sorry, corrected. –  Yuval Filmus Jun 5 '11 at 19:48
    
I think what would help is a kind of "continuity relation" for convex/concave functions. $f(x)=(1-x^p)^{1/p}$ for $p\geq 2$ is a concave function. There are often inequalities of the type $|f(x)-f(y)|<f(|x-y|)$ under appropriate restrictions on $x$ and $y$. With a bit of tweaking, I think we could get the end result. –  Raskolnikov Jun 5 '11 at 20:01
    
I was only able to show $|z_2|-|z_4|\le (1-|z_1\overline{z}_3+z_2\overline{z}_4|^p)^{1/p}$. –  Sunni Jun 5 '11 at 23:09
add comment

From where Yuval left off, it's easy to prove the case $p=2$. In that case

$$|(1-(\sin \alpha)^p)^{1/p} - (1-(\sin \beta)^p)^{1/p}| \leq (1 - (\cos (\alpha-\beta))^p)^{1/p} \; ,$$

reduces to

$$|\cos \alpha - \cos \beta | \leq \sin(\alpha-\beta) \; ,$$

assuming without loss of generality that $\alpha > \beta$. (Note, the case $\alpha=\beta$ is trivial even when $p>2$ anyway). With this assumption, we can also write

$$\cos \beta \leq \cos \alpha + \sin(\alpha-\beta) \; ,$$

or working out the $\sin$ with a formula for subtraction of angles and rearranging

$$\frac{\cos \beta}{1-\sin \beta} \leq \frac{\cos \alpha}{1-\sin \alpha} \; .$$

Thus, proving the case $p=2$ amounts to showing that $\frac{\cos x}{1-\sin x}$ is an increasing function of $x$ over $[0,\pi/2]$, which can be done by looking at its derivative.

I didn't find the case $p>2$ yet, but I still think exploiting the concavity properties of $(1-x^p)^{1/p}$ is a key to solving the problem.

share|improve this answer
1  
$$\frac{\cos\,x}{1-\sin\,x}=\cot\left(\frac{\pi}{4}-\frac{x}{2}\right)$$ could have been used as well. –  J. M. Nov 22 '11 at 14:02
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.