Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

suppose we are given a short exact sequence of $\mathbb{Z}G$-modules $$0\to K\to F\to A\to 0$$ where $F$ is free. and we form a diagram with that first row and with a second row $0\to L\to M\to N\to 0$ short exact but with no special condition and vertical arrows $\alpha\colon K\to L$, $\beta\colon F\to M$ and $\gamma\colon A\to N$. (Sorry about the horrible way of writing the diagram but I don't know how to write it without the xy package!) Suppose also that $\beta$ is an isomorphism. Could we say that $\gamma$ is an isomorphism as well? Could we use the five lemma to say so, or should we necessarily assume that $\alpha$ is an isomorphism too? Thank you in advance, bye!

share|improve this question
    
How about $K=F=M=N = \mathbb{Z}G$ and $A=L=0$ for the first question? –  t.b. Jun 5 '11 at 10:29
    
oh that's right! How could I be so stupid!? Well... thanks a lot! And what about if I take first row $0\to F_0\to F_1\to A$ and second row $0\to F_0\to F_1\to N$ dropping in this way the surjectivity but requiring both $F_0$ and $F_1$ to be free? In this case I would have two isomorphisms $\alpha$ and $\beta$ and by diagram chasing I should be able to prove that $\gamma$ is an isomorphism. Is it right? Does any module $A$ admit an exact sequence $0\to F_0\to F_1\to A $? ìf I'm not wrong, this should mean that every module has a submodule isomorphic to the quotient of two free modules. –  fatoddsun Jun 5 '11 at 11:08

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

As I indicated in a comment, the first question has a negative answer, as shown by a silly example. The second one has a positive answer, though, as is easy to check (and it suffices to assume that $\alpha$ is epi and there's no need to assume that $F$ is free).

For the fun of it, let me mention an overkill way of doing it:

The sharp four lemma states:

If the rows of $$\begin{array}{ccccccc} A_1 & \to & A_2 & \to & A_3 & \to & A_4 \\\ \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow \\\ B_1 & \to & B_2 & \to & B_3 & \to & B_4 \end{array}$$ are exact, $A_1 \to B_1$ is epi and $A_2 \to B_2$ and $A_4 \to B_4$ are isos then $A_3 \to B_3$ is mono. The proof is a simple diagram chase.

From this and its dual — or by a direct diagram chase — you can easily conclude the sharp five lemma: If the rows of $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc} A_1 & \to & A_2 & \to & A_3 & \to & A_4 & \to & A_5\\\ \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow\\\ B_1 & \to & B_2 & \to & B_3 & \to & B_4 & \to & B_5 \end{array}$$ are exact, $A_1 \to B_1$ is epi, $A_5 \to B_5$ is mono and $A_2 \to B_2$ and $A_4 \to B_4$ are isos then $A_3 \to B_3$ is an iso.

Now let $A_1 \to B_1$ be $\alpha$, $A_2 \to B_2$ be $\beta$ and let $A_4 = A_5 = B_4 = B_5 = 0$ to get the desired conclusion that $\gamma$ is an isomorphism.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.