Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The following problem is in Dacorogna's book "Introduction to the Calculus of Variations": Let $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ be open and bounded with a Lipschitz boundary. Let $f\in C(\mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}\times\overline{\Omega}), f=f(\xi,u, x)$ satisfy

$(\mathcal{H})\quad$ there exists $p>q\geq 1$ and $\alpha_1>0, \alpha_2, \alpha_3\geq 0$ such that \begin{equation} f(\xi, u, x)\geq \alpha_1|\xi|^p-\alpha_2|u|^q-\alpha_3, \quad \forall\ (\xi, u, x)\in\mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}\times\overline{\Omega}. \end{equation}

Consider the problem: \begin{equation} (\mathcal{P})\quad\text{inf}\left\{I(u)=\int_{\Omega} f(Du, u, x)\ \mathrm{d}x\ \Big| \ u\in u_0+ W_{0}^{1, p}(\Omega) \right\}=m \end{equation} where $u_0\in W^{1, p}(\Omega)$ with $I(u_0)<\infty$.

I am trying to show that if $\{u_k\}_{k=1}^{\infty}\subset u_0+W^{1, p}_0(\Omega)$ is a minimising sequence, that is \begin{equation} I(u_k)\rightarrow m\quad \text{as } k\rightarrow\infty, \end{equation} then $\{Du_k\}_{k=1}^{\infty}$ is uniformly bounded in $L^p(\Omega)$.

My argument is as follows:

Assume $\alpha_1> q/p$ and that $\alpha_2>0$. For $k$ sufficiently large we have \begin{align} m+1\geq I(u_k)&\geq \alpha_1\|Du_k\|_p^p-\alpha_2\|u_k\|_q^q- \alpha_3\mathcal{L}^n(\Omega)\\ &\geq\alpha_1 \|Du_k\|_p^p-\alpha_2C\|Du_k\|_q^q- \alpha_3\mathcal{L}^n(\Omega)\quad\text{by Poincare's inequality}\\ &\geq\alpha_1 \|Du_k\|_p^p-\gamma_1\|Du_k\|_p^q- \gamma_2\quad \text{since } L^p(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^q(\Omega)\\ &\geq\alpha_1 \|Du_k\|_p^p-\frac{q}{p}\|Du_k\|_p^p- \gamma_3\quad\text{by Young's inequality}\\ &\geq\left[\alpha_1-\frac{q}{p}\right]\|Du_k\|_p^p-\gamma_3 \end{align} where all the constants above are positive. How can I arrive at a similar conclusion, that is \begin{equation} m+1\geq C\|Du_k\|_p^p-\gamma \end{equation} where $C, \gamma>0$ if $\alpha_1\leq q/p$?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

It is not necessary to impose condition on $\alpha_1$, in fact, you can argue like this. By the second line of your inequality, we have that $$\tag{1}m+1\geq \alpha_1\|Du_k\|_p^p-\gamma_1\|Du_k\|_p^q-\gamma_2$$

Consider the polynomious $p(x)=\alpha_1 x^p-\gamma_1 x^q-\gamma_2$ for $x\geq 0$. $(1)$ implies that $$\tag{2}p(\|Du_k\|_p)\leq m+1$$

but $\alpha_1>0$ and $q<p$, so for $(2)$ to be true in necessary that the leading term is bounded, i.e. $\|Du_K\|_p$ must be bounded.

share|improve this answer

There is also another way:

We will assume $\gamma_1>0$. Young's inequality with $\varepsilon$ is \begin{equation} ab\leq\varepsilon a^P+C(\varepsilon)b^Q\quad(a, b, \varepsilon>0). \end{equation}Letting $a\equiv\|Du_k\|_p^q, \ b\equiv 1, \ P\equiv p/q, \ Q\equiv P/P-1$ and using this in Young's inequality above, we obtain \begin{equation*} \|Du_k\|_p^q\leq\varepsilon\|Du_k\|_p^p+C(\varepsilon) \end{equation*} Using this estimate in \begin{equation} m+1\geq\alpha_1 \|Du_k\|_p^p-\gamma_1\|Du_k\|_p^q-\gamma_2 \end{equation} gives \begin{equation*} m+1\geq(\alpha_1-\gamma_1\varepsilon)\|Du_k\|_p^p-\gamma_2-\gamma_1C(\varepsilon) \end{equation*} and by setting $\varepsilon=\alpha_1/\gamma_12$ we can conclude that $\|Du_k\|_p$ is bounded.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.