Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For three events $A, B, C$ we know that $P(A\cap B) = 0.4, P(A \cap C)=0.5 \text{ and } P(B\cap C)=0.6$

(a) Derive which values $P(A\cap B \cap C)$ can take, with a clear explanation. Show in every step which axiom you use. You can only make use of the following axioms:

  1. $P(A)\geq 0$
  2. $P(S)=1$
  3. $P(A_1\cup A_2 \cup \dots)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty A_i, \text{ } \forall i\neq j$

(b) Let $D=(A\cap B^c \cap C^c) \cup (A^c\cap B \cap C^c) \cup (A^c\cap B^c \cap C)$. Which are the values that $P(D)$ can take? Give a clear explanation of your derivations.

What I attempted so far


I came this far: $A\cap B=(A\cap B \cap C) \cup (A\cap B \cap C^c)$ (these sets are disjoint). Hence $P(A\cap B \cap C) \leq P(A\cap B) = 0.4$, by axioms 3 and 2, since $P(A\cap B \cap C^c)\geq 0$.

By making a Venn-diagram I figured out that the lower boundary should probably be $0.25$, as this is $0.4+0.5+0.6-1=0.5$ (which is everything that should be in some intersection because the total probability cannot be greater than one) devided by $2$ (because the $0.5$ can be split over two intersections). However, I am not sure how to show this using the axioms provided. Could anyone please help?

(b) I think I will need the result from a. I am however not at all sure yet what I should do to solve this question. Any help would be appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Here’s a way to formalize your Venn diagram argument.

Let $X=(A\cap B)\cup(A\cap C)\cup(B\cap C)$, and let $Y=A\cap B\cap C$. Then $X$ is the disjoint union of the sets $Y$, $X_{AB}=(A\cap B)\setminus Y$, $X_{AC}=(A\cap C)\setminus Y$, and $X_{BC}=(B\cap C)\setminus Y$. Note that $A\cap B$ is the disjoint union of $X_{AB}$ and $Y$, so $0.4=P(A\cap B)=P(X_{AB})+P(Y)$, and $P(X_{AB})=0.4-P(Y)$. Similarly, $P(X_{AC})=0.5-P(Y)$ and $P(X_{BC})=0.6-P(Y)$. Thus,

$$\begin{align*} P(X)&=P(X_{AB})+P(X_{AC})+P(X_{BC})+P(X)\\ &=(0.4-P(Y))+(0.5-P(Y))+(0.6-P(Y))+P(Y)\\ &=1.5-2P(Y)\;, \end{align*}$$

or $P(Y)=\frac12(1.5-P(X))\ge\frac12(1.5-1.0)=0.25$, since $P(X)\le 1$.

To do a really thorough job on (a), for each $p\in[0.25,0.4]$ you should demonstrate that it’s possible to arrange $A,B$, and $C$ so that $P(Y)=p$. I would at least draw Venn diagrams illustrating the two extremes.

For (d), note that $D=(A\cup B\cup C)\setminus X$, where $X$ is as above: it’s the set of points belonging to exactly one of the sets $A,B$, and $C$. Thus,

$$P(D)=P(A\cup B\cup C)-P(X)=P(A\cup B\cup C)-1.5+2P(Y)\;.$$

Bearing in mind that $P(A\cup B\cup C)\le 1$, what can you say about the possible range of values of $P(D)$? Again, you should check to be sure that the apparent extremes are actually possible.

share|cite|improve this answer
Wow, what a great answer! Thank you very much for your great effort! To answer your last question, I think that using the fact that $P(A\cup B \cup C)\leq 1$ gives me the inequality $P(D)\leq 0.3$ (since using the other inequality that can be obtained using the range for $P(Y)$ gives contradicting inequality signs I think, and would thus not give you a definite inequality). Am I right? – dreamer Jun 30 '13 at 8:53
@rbm: Looks good to me. You’re welcome! – Brian M. Scott Jun 30 '13 at 9:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.