Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Any hints on translating this English sentence into symbolic logic:

Something is between everything.

share|cite|improve this question
Is there any more context? "Between everything" is not really well-defined; "between" is usually between two elements. Moreover, if an element X is between everything, and X is part of everything, is X between itself? – Gadi A Jun 4 '11 at 7:37
@Gadi, when doing these translations from English to symbolic logic, I use Between(x, y, z) to say "x is between y and z." Also, we use x != y && x !=z && y != z. – KerxPhilo Jun 4 '11 at 7:44
That doesn't answer Gadi's question. "everything" is not two elements, so it's unclear what $y$ and $z$ might be in your predicate. – joriki Jun 4 '11 at 7:56
The closest thing to this sentence that makes sense might be "There is something between any two things". That would be $\forall y\forall z\exists x\,\text{Between} (x,y,z)$. – joriki Jun 4 '11 at 7:58
This question is ill-formed and does not really parse. I am having a Russell-paradox headache here. – ncmathsadist Jun 6 '11 at 2:06
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Here is a quick list of rule of thumbs for translation:

  • "Some" means $\exists x$
  • "Every" and "All" mean $\forall x$
  • "If x then y" or "x implies y" or "y only if x" mean $x\rightarrow y$
  • "Either x, or y" means $x\lor y$
  • "Both x and y" means $x\land y$
  • "Not x" means $\lnot x$

The actual predicates you would have to fill in on your own.

As joriki and Gadi commented, "Between" is a trinary predicate (i.e. takes three variables, "x is between y and z") and the closest interpretation of the current sentence would be $\exists x\forall y\forall z\operatorname{Between}(x,y,z)$.

(Note the difference in the order I put the quantifiers and joriki put them, in his version between every two elements there is a third; in my version one specific element is between every two others, including itself.)

share|cite|improve this answer
The other difference between you and joriki is that your statement is less likely to be true (though it does depend on what "Between" means). – Henry Jun 4 '11 at 13:53
@Henry, assume $x$ is God in the Judeo-Christian tradition, then god is between everything including itself and itself. :-) – Asaf Karagila Jun 4 '11 at 14:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.