Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Having some difficulty translating into English from Symbolic logic (the mixture of the quantifiers are confusing to me):

∀x(¬∃yBackOf(y, x) → Large(x))

Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
@yunone, I modified my question. I agree it didn't make sense. Thanks :) – KerxPhilo Jun 4 '11 at 7:17
up vote 2 down vote accepted

In English, I would say that as "for any $x$, if there is no $y$ such that $y$ is the back of $x$, then $x$ is large."

share|cite|improve this answer
what do you think of "For all things that not one thing is in back of it, that thing is large." – KerxPhilo Jun 4 '11 at 7:36
@Kerx, yes, I believe that works as well. – yunone Jun 4 '11 at 7:38
thank you very much. – KerxPhilo Jun 4 '11 at 7:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.