Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have been given:

$$\ln{n}=\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{n}\text{ for sufficiently large }n$$

Which I can equate to $\ln(n)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{i}$

The series I need to sum is:


I know this can be determined by doing $\ln(80000)-\frac{1}{2}\ln(40000)$, but is it valid to say:

$$\ln{2n-1}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{2i-1}=\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{5}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\text{ ?}$$

If not, a brief reason why it isn't valid would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance

PS. This is part of a question from the Cambridge maths paper STEP III 2008

share|cite|improve this question
$Ln(2n-1)$ would be $1+1/2+ ...+ 1/(2n-1)$ – Mlazhinka Shung Gronzalez LeWy Jun 25 '13 at 16:13
Your given is not true. The limit of the difference of $\ln n$ and $\sum 1/k$ is a constant, but the constant is not zero. – Thomas Andrews Jun 25 '13 at 16:55

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{2 i-1} = \sum_{i=1}^{2 n} \frac{1}{i} - \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{2 i} \sim \log{(2 n)} - \frac12 \log{n} = \log{2} + \frac12 \log{n}$$

Meanwhile, in the limit as $n \to \infty$,

$$\log{(2 n-1)} = \log{2} + \log{\left ( n-\frac12\right)} = \log{2} + \log{n} + \log{\left ( 1-\frac{1}{2 n}\right)} \sim \log{2} + \log{n}$$

These approximations simply do not match, even to the lowest order. So, no, they are not the same.

share|cite|improve this answer

I think that $\lim_{n\to\infty}\ln (2n-1)$ should be simplified as $\sum^{2n-1}_{i} 1/i$ and not $\sum^{n}_{i} 1/(2i-1)$

So thats why maybe your answer doesn't match.

share|cite|improve this answer

The answer is no. $Ln(3)=1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}$. If your formula were valid, it would be $1+\frac{1}{3}$.

Also, the usual name for these sums is the harmonic numbers, denoted $H_n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Apologies for the slight necro - just wanted to point out the starting line was for "sufficiently large n" - I would doubt many would consider only a couple of terms to be sufficiently large – Dangercrow Sep 23 '15 at 23:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.