Why is this function bounded and Lipschitz?

Suppose $f \in \mathbb{R}[x]$ and define $g \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ by $$g(x) = \frac{f(x)^2}{(x^2+1)^{d+1}}, \text{where } d = \deg(f)$$

I'm looking for a quick proof as to why $g$ is bounded above and Lipschitz.

Edit: $g$ is not proper as mentioned below.

-
@James: What have you tried? For example, what difficulty do you find in showing $g$ is bounded above? – JavaMan May 31 '11 at 1:07
@James, what is $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pm\infty} g(x)$ ? – lhf May 31 '11 at 1:25
Intuitively all of these seem obvious. For example, $g$ should be bounded above by $\max g(c)$ where $c$ is a critical point of $g$. I feel like all of the proofs could be done by contradiction but I was looking for something more explicit (i.e., "this is the upper bound", or "this is the Lipschitz constant"). – James Rohal May 31 '11 at 1:26
@James: All zeros of $f$ are critical points of $g$ (but there may be others). Do you expect to be able to find all critical points of $g$ explicity? – lhf May 31 '11 at 1:31
Let $\eta:=\max_{x\in{\mathbb R}} g(x)$. If $f$ has a real zero then $g({\mathbb R})=[0,\eta]$, so $g$ is not proper. – Christian Blatter May 31 '11 at 8:05
Hints: to show $g(x)$ is
• Bounded Above: $g$ is everywhere continuous (why?) and $\displaystyle\lim_{x \to \pm \infty} g(x)$ are finite.
• Lipschitz: It would be enough to show that $g'(x)$ is bounded for every $x$.
 By the way, I just realized the the hint for the Lipschitz part only works if $f$ is differentiable. Otherwise, you may just need to compute $\frac{g(x)- g(y)}{x-y}$ by hand. – JavaMan Jun 1 '11 at 1:11