Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I suspect it is impossible to split a (any) 3d solid into two, such that each of the pieces is identical in shape (but not volume) to the original. How can I prove this?

share|cite|improve this question
On a related note: Kimmo Eriksson proves in [The American Mathematical Monthly Vol. 103, No. 5 (May, 1996), pp. 393-400] that a convex polygon is splittable in two properly congruent pieces iff it has rotational symmetry. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Sep 7 '10 at 17:16
A couple of questions. 1) What exactly does split mean? 2) Why is this tagged topology? – Aryabhata Sep 7 '10 at 17:25
Is this connected to the Banach-Tarski paradox? – Isaac Sep 7 '10 at 18:36
Was thinking of a 3d analogue to Pythagoras' Theorem. – Guillermo Phillips Sep 7 '10 at 19:02
Isaac, I don't think so, because that paradox involves dividing a sphere into non-spherical pieces. But I am also curious if there are any solutions involving pathological shapes or division methods. – Dan Brumleve Sep 8 '10 at 1:13

You can certainly take a rectangular box, $2^{1/3} \times 2^{2/3} \times 2$ and slice it into two boxes of size $1 \times 2^{1/3} \times 2^{2/3}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm confused, doesn't this contradict the theorem in the answer Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote? – anon Sep 7 '10 at 18:47
Not impossible then. – Guillermo Phillips Sep 7 '10 at 18:59
@muad: Boxes aren't strictly convex. – whuber Sep 7 '10 at 19:51
@whuber, thank you - I understand now – anon Sep 7 '10 at 20:24
Also can we make the pieces different sizes and connect them sideways, like a Golden Rectangle? How many different ways are there to do this in n-space? – Dan Brumleve Sep 8 '10 at 1:37

It seems that Puppe and others proved that this is impossible for any strictly convex solid. See [B. L van den Waerden, Aufgabe Nr 51, Elem. Math. 4 (1949) 18, 140]

The reference comes from Unsolved problems in geometry by Hallard T. Croft, K. J. Falconer and Richard K. Guy.

share|cite|improve this answer
Is it also true that no strictly convex solid can be divided into any two strictly convex pieces, whether or not they are identical with each other or either with the original? – Dan Brumleve Sep 8 '10 at 1:06
@Dab, I would imagine that that is true (for at a point where the two pieces touch which is not at the boundary of the original body at most one of them will be strictly convex) – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Sep 8 '10 at 9:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.