Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How can I solve for $x$:


Any clues?

share|cite|improve this question
does the rhs converge for any $x$? – yoyo Jun 14 '13 at 18:16
Some quick calculations lead me to believe that the series does not converge, but I might be wrong. – Javier Jun 14 '13 at 18:24
Each term can be written as $\frac{a+bx}{c+dx}$ where $a,b,c,d$ are Fibonacci numbers. I'll need a little moment to figure out which they are. – Thomas Andrews Jun 14 '13 at 18:26
@ThomasAndrews $\displaystyle \frac{F_nx+F_{n-1}}{F_{n+1}x+F_n}$ starting at $n=0$ I believe. (typo) – anon Jun 14 '13 at 18:27

$$a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{1+a_n},\ a_0=1/x,\ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n=1$$

Unfortunately, $a_n$ converges to a non zero constant $\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}$, so that the sum of all $a_n$'s is infinity.

share|cite|improve this answer

We deal with a function $x\mapsto \frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{x}}$, which if we take $\frac{1}{x}$ as argument, we should rather write as $x\mapsto \frac{1}{1+x}$.

Iterated, this gives the fixed point iteration for finding a soltion of $\frac{1}{1+x}=x$. And therefore all your terms eventually turn out converge to a solution of $1=(1+x)\ x$, namely $\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}$ (see golden ratio), making the total sum diverge.

Some Mathematica code:

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 Beat me to it :) – nbubis Jun 14 '13 at 18:33
Do the terms ever converge to $-\varphi$ besides $x=-\varphi$? – anon Jun 14 '13 at 18:34
@anon: $|\varphi|\approx 0.618<1$, so the result is positive. There is no square, the $x$ on the right hand side of $\frac{1}{1+x}=x$ is dropped. – NikolajK Jun 14 '13 at 18:42
@vermiculus: eww, why did you do that? ;P – NikolajK Jun 15 '13 at 0:03
@NickKidman Hehehehehe Hey man, if people vote it up, it ought to be persistent. It'd be nice to see a formal proof, even though the original equation is a definition for $\phi$, but a table --- while not conclusive --- has immediate and observable value. (What would be better to see is a graph of these data.) – Sean Allred Jun 15 '13 at 0:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.