Suppose you have a linear system like this:
$$\mathbf{x}[k+1] = \mathbf{D} \mathbf{x}[k]$$
where matrix $\mathbf{D}$ is diagonal. Assume its diagonal entries are real, greater than zero and less than one, but not necessarily distinct. Is it still technically correct to say that the convergence rate is determined by the largest value in $\mathbf{D}$?
And what about non-diagonalizable matrices (when eigenvalues have multiplicity greater than one)?
Tell me more
×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
The diagonal case is trivial because the system decouples into one-dimensional ones. If the matrix is not diagonalizable, and the largest block in the Jordan normal form for the largest eigenvalue $\lambda$ is $m \times m$, then you can have $\|x[n]\| \sim C n^{m-1} \lambda^n$ as $n \to \infty$. This is because if $B$ is a matrix with $(B-\lambda I)^m = 0$ and $(B - \lambda I)^{m-1} \ne 0$, $B^n = (B-\lambda I+ \lambda I)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} {n \choose k} \lambda^{n-k} (B-\lambda I)^k$, and ${n \choose k}$ is a polynomial in $n$ of degree $k$. |
||||
|
|