Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The set-builer notation is used to have

$$\{ x \mid P(x) \} = \{ x \mid Q(x) \}$$


$$\forall x\ \big(P(x) \Leftrightarrow Q(x) \big).$$

And some people write

$$\{ x \in U \mid P(x) \} = \{ x \in U \mid Q(x) \}$$

to denote

$$\forall x\ \big( x \in U \Rightarrow (P(x) \Leftrightarrow Q(x)) \big).$$

Now I want to translate the frequently used

$$\{ f(x) \mid P(x) \} = \{ g(x) \mid Q(x) \}$$

where the elements are not $x$, but sets constructed from them via $f$ and $g$. My try is

$$\forall y\ \big(\exists x\ \big(y=f(x)\land P(x)) \Leftrightarrow \exists x'\ \big(y=g(x')\land Q(x')\big) \big)$$

but I'm e.g. not sure about the existential quantifiert, or if I really need two.

I figure a necessary condition for having found the right way would be to try $f=g=\text{id}$ and see the formula reducing to the previous expression. However, I fail at this, because I don't know how to unpack it. I think I'd have to use $y=x$ and $y=x'$, but I don't know how I'd formally get this statement out of the long formula, so that I can use it?

What is the right way to read $\{ f(x) \mid P(x) \} = \{ g(x) \mid Q(x) \}$ and how to show it reduces to $\forall x\ \big(P(x) \Leftrightarrow Q(x) \big)$ for $f=g=\text{id}$?

share|improve this question
I didn't read everything, but hopefully this will help: $\{f(x)|P(x)\}$ should be read as $$\{y|\bigl(\exists x\in \text{dom}(f)\bigr)(f(x)=y)\land P(x)\}.$$ Related. –  Git Gud Jun 8 '13 at 19:39

1 Answer 1

Your translation is correct. To unpack the specialization to $f=g=\text{id}$, use the fact (of logic) that $\exists x\,(y=x\land P(x))$ is equivalent to $P(y)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.