Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am not so sure whether the meaning of $$\mathbb Z_+$$ is very clear. How many different definitions are there? Does the definition that is used depend on whether the writer is English or German?

In French maths, this notation doesn't exist.

share|improve this question
    
I think that we use the notations : $\mathbb{Z}=\{\ldots,-2,-1,0,1,2,\ldots\}$, $\mathbb{Z}_+=\{0,1,2,\ldots\}$ and $\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,\ldots\}$ –  Thibaut Dumont Jun 7 '13 at 13:55
    
It depends on the context. A guess is that it means the additive group of $\Bbb Z$, i.e. $\Bbb Z$ when one considers the addition only. –  Andrea Mori Jun 7 '13 at 13:56
    
Without any doubt $\mathbb N$ includes $0$. –  Damien L Jun 7 '13 at 13:59
5  
@DamienL, alas there is doubt. –  vadim123 Jun 7 '13 at 14:00
3  
@vadim123: In fact $0\in\Bbb N$ is a counterexample to the principle of the excluded middle: it is a proposition that contains no variables, yet it is neither true nor false ;-( –  Marc van Leeuwen Jun 7 '13 at 14:38

3 Answers 3

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Many people would interpret this to mean $\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$, although some might argue for $\{0,1,2,3,\ldots\}$. Absent any other context I don't think any other interpretations are likely.

Sadly, many authors use notations without defining them, because they are "standard" in their little corner of mathematics.

share|improve this answer
    
That would more likely be $\Bbb Z_{>0}$ or $\Bbb Z_{\geq0}$, but everything is possible! –  Andrea Mori Jun 7 '13 at 13:58
1  
Some people still uses : $\mathbb{R}_+=[0,\infty)$ for $\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$. –  Thibaut Dumont Jun 7 '13 at 14:05
1  
Which causes my stupefaction about how people could "resolve" the ambiguity of the symbol $\Bbb N$ with another one that raises exactly the same problem! –  Marc van Leeuwen Jun 7 '13 at 14:41

Symbol "$+$" means "positive", so $\mathbb{Z}_+$ shoud properly be understood as $\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$. It's less confusing that undefined $\mathbb{N}$ in some paper, where we don't know if it includes $0$.

share|improve this answer
1  
It's interesting because in french "positif" means non-negative. So it needs context probably. –  Thibaut Dumont Jun 7 '13 at 14:07
4  
Actually $+$ means addition, not positive. If $n<0$ then $+n$ is (also) negative while $-n$ is positive. Therefore $\Bbb Z_+$ is an abomination that only makes the embassement of not being able to assign a uinque truth value to $0\in\Bbb N$ even worse; it should have been $\Bbb Z_{>0}$ (or even better $\Bbb N_{>0}$), which would never have raised the current question. –  Marc van Leeuwen Jun 7 '13 at 14:36
    
It depends on context. For example, when we are talking about electric fileds, positive electric charge is labaled by "$+$", and negative by "$-$" (not by $">0"$ nor $"<0"$). Thus I don't see anything wrong in labeling positive numbers by "$+$". This example could be used also as a respond to @Thibaut Dumont: I think that putting "$0$" as a positive number (like in french notation) is not too good ($0$ is not positive nor negative; it's neutral). –  Bartek Pawlik Jun 7 '13 at 15:38

For the French notation $\mathbb N=\{0,1,2,3,\ldots\}$ and $\mathbb N^*=\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$ and and the notation $\mathbb Z_+$ is not used in general but it means $\mathbb N$.

share|improve this answer
    
In the U.S. it is far from standard but common is $\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$ and $\mathbb{N}_0=\{0,1,2,\ldots\}$. –  vadim123 Jun 7 '13 at 14:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.