Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Beal's Conjecture, are we assuming that we are allowed to repeat numbers? The conjecture is the following:

Beals Conjecture: If $a^n+b^n = c^n $where $n \geq 2$ and $a,b,c,n \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}$ then $a,b$ and $c$ have a common prime factor.

But isn't this basically the opposite of Fermat's Last Theorem? Or does Fermat's Last Theorem require $a,b,c$ to be distinct?

share|cite|improve this question
A generalization of Fermat's last theorem ( – lab bhattacharjee Jun 6 '13 at 18:30
That's not Beals conjecture you've posted. – Thomas Andrews Jun 6 '13 at 18:33
Slashdot and Texas Banker, huh? – Zeta.Investigator Jun 6 '13 at 18:49

This is not Beal's conjecture. You have in fact stated Fermat's Last Theorem. Beal's conjecture states that if $a^x + b^y = c^z$, where $a,b,c > 0$ and $x,y,z > 2$, then $\gcd(a,b,c) \neq 1$. Fermat's Last Theorem is an easy corollary of Beal's Conjecture.

share|cite|improve this answer

This is not Beal's conjecture! Beal's conjecture is about $$a^x + b^y = c^z$$ where $x,y,z$ are probably not equal.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.