Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\phi_n\colon [a,b]\to \mathbb R$ be a sequence of continuous functions. Assuming there is an $A\subset [a,b]$ such that $\phi_n|_A$ converges uniformly to $\phi\colon A\to \mathbb R$, I have already proven that for all $x\in \bar A$ the closure of $A$ the sequence $(\phi_n(x))$ converges. Defining $\bar\phi$ on $\bar A$ by the pointwise limit of $\phi_n$ it seems to me, $\bar\phi$ should be continuous on $\bar A$ but I cannot bring a proof together.

My idea: I have already proven, that for any finite set $B\subset \bar A$ the function $\bar\phi$ is continuous on $B\cup A$, and I was now trying to extend this to the entire $\bar A$ with Zorn's Lemma, but showing that, if $A\subset B_1\subset B_2 \subset \dots\subset \bar A$ and $\bar\phi$ is continuous on each $B_k$ then it is also on $\bigcup B_k$, is making some problems. Note that could also assume uniform continuity everywhere.

Note the thoughts of Continuity on a union.

share|cite|improve this question
Show that $\phi_n \to \phi$ uniformly on $\overline{A}$. – Qiaochu Yuan May 25 '11 at 16:38
@Qiaochu: Did you think this to the end or is this only a guess how you would approach it? I will try it myself, but it didn't seem to promising to me on first glance. – Peter Patzt May 25 '11 at 18:33
I don't see why this wouldn't work. $\sup_{x \in A} |\phi_n(x) - \phi_m(x)|$ should be equal to $\sup_{x \in \bar{A}} |\phi_n(x) - \phi_m(x)|$, so one sequence is Cauchy in the sup norm if and only if the other is. – Qiaochu Yuan May 25 '11 at 18:40
@Qiaochu: See and I don't know why I didn't consider that. – Peter Patzt May 25 '11 at 18:44
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Since the sequence of continuous functions $(\phi_n)$ converges uniformly in $A$, then it converges uniformly also in $\overline{A}$. This fact can be proved in a moment using the Cauchy criterion for uniform convergence, since by continuity $\sup_{a\in A} |\phi_n(x) - \phi_k(x)| = \sup_{x\in\overline{A}} |\phi_n(x) - \phi_k(x)|$. Now, again by the continuity of the $\phi_n$, we conclude that the uniform limit $\phi$ is continuous.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.