Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be an inductive set. Let $T = \{x \in X : x \subset X\}$. Then let $t \in T$. My question is why does the following hold: $y \in t \implies y \subset t$?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

It doesn’t necessarily. Let $a=\{\{\varnothing\}\}$, and let $X$ be the inductive closure of $\big\{a,\{a\}\big\}$, so that $X$ is inductive. Let $T=\{x\in X:x\subseteq X\}$; then $\{a\}\in T$. Clearly $a\in\{a\}$, but $a\nsubseteq\{a\}$: the only element of $a$ is $\{\varnothing\}$, which is not equal to $a$, the only element of $\{a\}$.

What is true is that $T$ is inductive.

Suppose that $t\in T$. $X$ is inductive, so $t\cup\{t\}\in X$. If $y\in t\cup\{t\}$, then either $y\in t\subseteq X$, or $y=t\in X$; in either case $y\in X$, so $t\cup\{t\}\subseteq X$, and therefore $t\cup\{t\}\in T$. Thus, $T$ is inductive.

share|improve this answer
    
Why in the case that $y \in t \subseteq X$ does this imply that $y \in X$? –  user1770201 Jun 5 '13 at 19:41
    
@user1770201: $t\subseteq X$ means that every element of $t$ is an element of $X$. –  Brian M. Scott Jun 5 '13 at 19:46

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.