Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Radioactive particles are emitted randomly over time from a source at an average rate of per second. In $n$ time periods of varying lengths $t_1,t_2,\dots,t_n$ (seconds), the numbers of particles emitted (as determined by an automatic counter) were $y_1,y_1,\dots,y_n$ respectively.

(b) Suppose that instead of knowing the $y_i$s, we know only whether or not there was one or more particles emitted in each time interval. Making a suitable assumption, give the likelihood function for $\theta$ based on these data, and describe how you can find the maximum likelihood estimate of $\theta$.

What would be a "suitable assumption"? The assumption I made was that each interval contains $1$ event if it has an event and no events if it does not have any event. This seems to be a trivializing and unsuitable assumption. What would the correct one be then?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

Suitable assumptions might be that $t_i$ are known and that this is a Poisson process with a uniform rate, and that the time intervals don't overlap.

Let $$ X_i = \left.\begin{cases} 1 & \text{if at least one emission in the $i$th time period}, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}, \end{cases}\right\} = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if }y_i\ge 1, \\ 0 & \text{if }y_i=0. \end{cases} $$ Then $\Pr(X_i=0)= e^{-\theta t_i}$ and $\Pr(X_i=1)=1-e^{-\theta t_i}$. So $$ L(\theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n (e^{-\theta t_i})^{1-X_i} (1-e^{-\theta t_i})^{X_i} $$ This allows a lot of simplification in the case where $t_1=\cdots=t_n$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Perhaps, the arrival of particles are independent of each other.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.