Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am wondering whether or not there is a reasonable characterization of differentiable functions $f: \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ such that $f'(f(x))=f(f'(x))$ for each $x\in\mathbb{R}$. (Or, if you like the composition sign, $f'\circ f=f\circ f'$).

I could only come up with trivial examples of such functions: $f(x)=0$ and $f(x)=e^{x}$.

This reminds me of a recent Putnam problem (2010), which asked whether or not there exists a strictly increasing function $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfying $f'(x)=f(f(x))$. (The answer is: No).

Note: I see that a question of similar type has been asked here.

share|cite|improve this question
$f(x) = x$ is also a solution since $f'(x) = 1$. – Cameron Williams Jun 2 '13 at 2:58
@CameronWilliams: Right. :) – Prism Jun 2 '13 at 3:06
Actually there is a larger class of functions than just $f(x) = x$ amongst monomial solutions. Let $n\in\mathbb{N}$, then $f(x) = n^{-n+1}x^n$ is a solution to the functional equation. – Cameron Williams Jun 2 '13 at 3:10
As for functions of the form $ax^2 + b$, the only nontrivial solution is $a = \frac{1}{2}, b = 1$. As for functions of the form $ax^2 + bx + c$ (with $c\neq 0$), there are no solutions. There are also no solutions for $ax^n + b$ when $n>2$. I think some binomial theorem or (abstract) algebraic arguments can be used to state what kinds of restrictions are needed for polynomial functions. – Cameron Williams Jun 2 '13 at 3:47
$f(x) = \frac{1}{x}$ is another solution. In fact, we can adapt the solution from before to get that $f(x) = (-1)^{n+1}n^{n+1}x^{-n}$ is also a solution. – Cameron Williams Jun 2 '13 at 4:07

This question seems like it will not have a simple solution.

As others have pointed out, there are a couple of interesting solutions based on , such as $f(x) = 0$ or $f(x) = e^x$ or $f(x) = (-1)^{n+1}n^{n+1}x^{-n}$ or $f(x) = 1/x$ (Though technically the last one isn't a function from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$).

However, what hasn't been done so far in the comments is to characterize the solutions by looking at the various values that $f \circ f'$ can take.

Therefore let's define $g = f \circ f' = f' \circ f$. Now the reason that makes this problem seem like it may not have a simple solution, is the fact that there are already a whole bunch of solutions just for the case $g = 0$, not all of which are smooth.

For $g = 0$, a trivial solution would be the function $f = 0$. However, if we take a function $h$ with compact support whose derivative is bounded, we can consider the function $f(x) := h(x - T)$ for some $T \in \mathbb{R}$. If we set $T$ large enough, $f$ takes on zero for all values of $f'$, satisfying $f \circ f' = 0$. Similarly, we know that $f$ is bounded given that it is continuous, leading us to conclude that $f' \circ f = 0$ for large enough T. This means that by taking any differentiable function with compact support and a bounded derivative, we can shift it far enough to the right (or left) to obtain a function that satisfies the equation of the question just for the special case of $g=0$. If I'm not mistaken, there are even functions in $C^1(\mathbb R)\setminus C^2(\mathbb{R})$ with finite support and a bounded derivative, meaning that we have some quite "not-nice" solutions.amongst the set of solutions.

Of course it isn't as easy to find solutions for other values of $g$ as it is for $g = 0$, but I think that the fact that this special case already has such a wide variety of solutions highlights the fact that this problem may be quite difficult to solve.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.