Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was trying to solve the recurrence $f_n=\exp(f_{n-1})$. My logic was this : $f_n -f_{n-1}=\exp(f_{n-1})-f_{n-1}$. The associated differential equation would then be $\dfrac{dg}{dn}=e^g-g$. if $f(m)=g(m)>0$ for some real $m$ then for $n>m$ we would have $g(n)>f(n)$. Solving the differential equation with seperating the variables gives the solution $g(n)= \mathrm{inv}(\int_c^{n} \dfrac{dt}{e^t-t}+c_1)+c_2$ for some $c,c_1,c_2$. That solutions seems correct since $e^t-t=0$ has no real solution for $t$ so there are no issues with singularities near the real line.

However $\mathrm{inv}(\int_c^{n} \dfrac{dt}{e^t-t}+c_1)+c_2$ Does NOT seem near $f_n$ let alone larger than it !! So where did I make a big mistake in my logic ? And can that mistake be fixed ?

share|cite|improve this question
I assume there is some $f_0$? – Asaf Karagila Jun 1 '13 at 21:56
Yes. But that value is not so important for the problem im having right ? – mick Jun 1 '13 at 21:57
Why inv(...) "Does NOT seem near fn let alone larger than it"? – Did Jun 1 '13 at 21:59
@Did the solution to $f_n$ grows superexponentially whereas the inv... does not , right ?! – mick Jun 1 '13 at 22:01
Superexponential growth means faster than $e^n , e^{e^n} , ...$ For those unaware of the meaning of that word. – mick Jun 1 '13 at 22:05
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The problem is that the primitive $\displaystyle\int_\cdot^x\frac{\mathrm dt}{\mathrm e^t-t}$ does not converge to infinity when $x\to+\infty$.

The comparison between $(f_n)$ and $g$ reads $$ \int_{f_1}^{f_n}\frac{\mathrm dt}{\mathrm e^t-t}\leqslant n-1, $$ for every $n\geqslant1$. When $n\to\infty$, the LHS converges to a finite limit hence one can be sure that the LHS and the RHS are quite different when $n\to\infty$ and that this upper bound becomes trivial for every $n$ large enough.

Take-home message: to compare the sequence $(f_n)$ solving a recursion $f_{n+1}=f_n+h(f_n)$ and the function $g$ solving the differential equation $g'(t)=h(g(t))$ can be fruitful only when the integral $\displaystyle\int_\cdot^{+\infty}\frac{\mathrm dt}{h(t)}$ diverges.

share|cite|improve this answer
I assumed this. Can you say more ? – mick Jun 1 '13 at 22:53
??? $ $ $ $ $ $ – Did Jun 2 '13 at 14:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.