Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the path fibration: $K(\mathbb Z,2r-1)\rightarrow PK(\mathbb Z,2r)\rightarrow K(\mathbb Z,2r).$

Suppose that $H^*(K(\mathbb Z,2r-1);\mathbb Q)=H^*(S^{2r-1};\mathbb Q).$

We want to show that $H^*(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)=\mathbb Q[a_{2r}]$.

The Gysin sequence gives that we have an isomorphism $$H^i(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)\stackrel{\cup e}{\rightarrow}H^{i+2r}(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)$$ where $\cup e$ is the cup product with the rational euler class.


Questions:

(1) Why is it that $e$ and the fundamental class $a_{2r}\in H^{i+2r}(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)\cong \mathbb Q$ are non-zero multiples of each other?

(2) What does the "fundamental class" mean in this context? and finally,

(3) I'm not clear as to how to deduce that $H^*(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)=\mathbb Q[a_{2r}]$.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

2) The defining property of $K(\mathbb Z,2r)$ is that for any $X$, we have $H^{2r}(X, \mathbb Z)= [X, K(\mathbb Z,2r)]$. In particular for $X=K(\mathbb Z,2r)$ we know that $H^{2r}(X, \mathbb Z)= \mathbb Z$ by Hurewitz and is generated by the element corrsponding to the identity map. This is the fundamental class. Similarly with $\mathbb Q$ coefficients.

1, 3) $H^i(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)\stackrel{\cup e}{\rightarrow}H^{i+2r}(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)$ means that $\cup e$ is an isomorphism from $H^0(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)$ to $H^{2r}(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)$. The later is generated by the fundamental class. Hence $e$ is plus or minus the fundamental class.

Now, by induction on $i$, all the $H^i$ with $i$ not multiple $2r$ are zero, while the others are all isomorpic to $\mathbb Q$ and are generated by $e$, $e^2$ etc. or equivalently by $a_{2r}$, $a_{2r}^2$ etc. That is, $H^*(K(\mathbb Z,2r);\mathbb Q)=\mathbb Q[a_{2r}]$.

share|improve this answer
    
thanks that explains it all.. –  palio May 25 '11 at 16:52
    
@palio You could accept the answer, then. –  Max May 27 '11 at 7:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.