Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While playing around with Mathematica, I found that

$$\int_0^1 \frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{1+x}dx = \frac{1}{3}\log^3(2)-\frac{\pi^2}{12}\log(2)+\frac{\zeta(3)}{8}$$

Please help me prove this result.

share|cite|improve this question
Let $u=\log(1+x)$, $du=1/(1+x)\,dx$ and $1-x=2-e^u$ transforms our integral into $$\int_0^{\log2}u\log(2-e^u)\,\mathrm{d}u$$... not sure what to do from there, however. – oldrinb Jun 1 '13 at 7:36
you can… – math110 Jun 1 '13 at 7:47
@math110: I think I just understood what you are trying to say. We can relate it to the Euler Sum in your link. $$\int_0^1 \frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{1+x}dx=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}(H_n)^2$$ – Integrals and Series Jun 1 '13 at 8:16
For a more generalized form of this integral, where the integral is over the range 0 to z rather than 0 to 1, see here -->> [… – user98087 Oct 1 '13 at 19:32

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Use your favorite program to compute the indefinite integral in terms of polylogarithms $$\int\frac{\ln(1+x)\ln(1-x)\,dx}{1+x}=\frac{\ln2}{2}\ln^2(1+x)-\ln(1+x)\,\mathrm{Li}_2\left(\frac{1+x}{2}\right)+\mathrm{Li}_3\left(\frac{1+x}{2}\right).$$ [This can be verified by straightforward differentiation].

To compute the definite integral, it suffices to know $\mathrm{Li}_{2,3}\left(\frac12\right)$ and $\mathrm{Li}_{2,3}(1)$. However, the definition of polylogarithm immediately implies $\mathrm{Li}_s(1)=\zeta(s)$. Also, the values $\mathrm{Li}_{2,3}\left(\frac12\right)$ can be found here (formulas (16), (17)).

share|cite|improve this answer
I can verify that the anti-derivative can be computed through some tedious integration by parts. – Potato Jun 1 '13 at 8:46
@Potato It is maybe not easy to guess the form of the antiderivative. But once you have a correct guess, to check it is a one-line calculation using that $\mathrm{Li}_2'(z)=-\ln(1-z)/z$ and $\mathrm{Li}_3'(z)=\mathrm{Li}_2(z)/z$. – Start wearing purple Jun 1 '13 at 8:50
@Potato: I think I understood what you mean. One integration by parts gives roughly $\mathrm{Li}_2(smth)$ instead of $\frac{\ln(1-z)}{1+z}$ and $1/(1+z)$ instead of $\ln(1+z)$. Subsequent integration gives $\mathrm{Li}_3$. – Start wearing purple Jun 1 '13 at 8:56
Thank O.L.! I did not realize that the indefinite integral would be so easy. – Integrals and Series Jun 1 '13 at 9:40
It's clear that the OP likes an analytically derivation. Otherwise, the OP can use a symbolic software to get the solution. – Felix Marin Aug 13 '14 at 19:45

$\newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil\, #1 \,\right\rceil\,} \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,} \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}} \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}} \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\vphantom{\large A}\,#2\,}\,} \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}} \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert}$ $\ds{\int_{0}^{1}{\ln\pars{1 + x}\ln\pars{1 - x} \over 1+x}\,\dd x:\ {\large}}$

With $\ds{0 < \mu < 1}$: \begin{align}&\color{#c00000}{\int_{0}^{\mu}% {\ln\pars{1 + x}\ln\pars{1 - x} \over 1+x}\,\dd x} \\[3mm]&=\half\,\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu}\ln\pars{1 - \mu} +\color{#00f}{\half\int_{0}^{\mu}{\ln^{2}\pars{1 + x} \over 1 - x}\,\dd x} \tag{1} \end{align}

\begin{align}&\color{#00f}{\half\int_{0}^{\mu}% {\ln^{2}\pars{1 + x} \over 1 - x}\,\dd x} =\half\int_{1}^{1 + \mu}{\ln^{2}\pars{x} \over 2 - x}\,\dd x =\half\int_{1/2}^{\pars{1 + \mu}/2}{\ln^{2}\pars{2x} \over 1 - x}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&=-\,\half\ln\pars{1 - {1 + \mu \over 2}}\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu} +\half\int_{1/2}^{\pars{1 + \mu}/2}\ln\pars{1 - x}\,{2\ln\pars{2x} \over x}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&=-\,\half\ln\pars{1 - \mu \over 2}\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu} -\int_{1/2}^{\pars{1 + \mu}/2}{\rm Li}_{2}'\pars{x}\ln\pars{2x}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&=-\,\half\,\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu}\ln\pars{1 - \mu} +\half\,\ln\pars{2}\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu} -{\rm Li}_{2}\pars{1 + \mu \over 2}\ln\pars{1 + \mu} \\[3mm]&+\int_{1/2}^{\pars{1 + \mu}/2}{\rm Li}_{2}\pars{x}\,{1 \over x}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&=-\,\half\,\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu}\ln\pars{1 - \mu} +\half\,\ln\pars{2}\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu} - {\rm Li}_{2}\pars{1 + \mu \over 2}\ln\pars{1 + \mu} \\[3mm]&+\int_{1/2}^{\pars{1 + \mu}/2}{\rm Li}_{3}'\pars{x}\,\dd x \end{align}

\begin{align} &\color{#00f}{\half\int_{0}^{\mu}% {\ln^{2}\pars{1 + x} \over 1 - x}\,\dd x} \\[3mm]&=-\,\half\,\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu}\ln\pars{1 - \mu} +\half\,\ln\pars{2}\ln^{2}\pars{1 + \mu} -{\rm Li}_{2}\pars{1 + \mu \over 2}\ln\pars{1 + \mu} \\[3mm]&+{\rm Li}_{3}\pars{1 + \mu \over 2} - {\rm Li}_{3}\pars{\half} \end{align}

Replacing in $\pars{1}$ and taking the limit $\ds{\mu \to 1^{-}}$: \begin{align}&\color{#c00000}{\int_{0}^{1}% {\ln\pars{1 + x}\ln\pars{1 - x} \over 1+x}\,\dd x} = \half\,\ln^{3}\pars{2} - {\rm Li}_{2}\pars{1}\ln\pars{2} +{\rm Li}_{3}\pars{1} - {\rm Li}_{3}\pars{\half} \end{align}

With the values: $$ {\rm Li}_{2}\pars{1} = {\pi^{2} \over 6}\,,\quad {\rm Li}_{3}\pars{1} = \zeta\pars{3}\,,\quad {\rm Li}_{3}\pars{\half} = {\ln^{3}\pars{2} \over 6} -{\ln\pars{2} \over 12}\,\pi^{2} + {7 \over 8}\,\zeta\pars{3} $$ we find

$$ \color{#66f}{\large\int_{0}^{1}% {\ln\pars{1 + x}\ln\pars{1 - x} \over 1+x}\,\dd x = {\ln^{3}\pars{2} \over 3} - {\ln\pars{2} \over 12}\,\pi^{2} +{1 \over 8}\,\zeta\pars{3}} \approx {\tt -0.3088} $$

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a nice answer! – Olivier Oloa Aug 13 '14 at 21:42
@OlivierOloa Thanks. It's nice to rely on PolyLogarithms... – Felix Marin Aug 16 '14 at 21:18

Ms. Chris's sis asked me exactly same question a few days ago in chatroom & I could answer it.

Here is my answer. Let $I$ be the integral. Using magic substitution $2t=1+x$ we get \begin{align} I&=\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 \frac{\log(2t)\log(2-2t)}{t}dt\\ &=\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 \frac{\log t\log(1-t)}{t}dt+\ln2\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 \frac{\log(1-t)}{t}dt+\ln2\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 \frac{\log t}{t}dt+\ln^22\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1\frac{1}{t}dt\\ &=I_1+I_2+I_3+I_4 \end{align} All of the above integrals are trivial. For instance, $I_1$ & $I_2$ can be solved by using elementary way: using series expansion for $$\frac{\log(1-t)}{t}=\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{t^{k-1}}{k}$$ We can also use the reflection formula for dilog function $$\text{Li}_2(x)+\text{Li}_2(1-x)=\frac{\pi^2}{6}-\ln x\ln(1-x)$$for solving $I_1$ and the integral representation of dilog function $$\text{Li}_2(x)=\int_0^x \frac{\log(1-t)}{t}dt$$for solving $I_2$. And for $I_3$ & $I_4$, of course an high school student can easily solved it. So $$I=\frac{1}{3}\ln^3(2)-\frac{\pi^2}{12}\ln(2)+\frac{\zeta(3)}{8}$$ Done! (>‿◠)✌

share|cite|improve this answer
Yuhuu @Chris'ssis! This is how I answer your question in chatroom. (ô‿ô) – Anastasiya-Romanova 秀 Sep 19 '14 at 17:43
Good job there, nice solution! (+1) Also keep in mind I didn't use any special function in my solution like polylogarithm (more specifically, dilogarithm). :-) – OFFSHARING Sep 19 '14 at 18:25
@Anastasiya-Romanova This is a nice answer :)! – Olivier Oloa Sep 19 '14 at 19:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.