Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Sorry about formatting, this is my first question here, and I have no idea how to do it properly.

Assuming I have two lines

$\displaystyle l_1 = \binom{x_1}{y_1} + a\binom{u_1}{v_1}$

$\displaystyle l_2 = \binom{x_2}{y_2} + b\binom{u_2}{v_2}$

Thus the intersection holds

$\displaystyle \binom{x_1}{y_1} + a\binom{u_1}{v_1} = \binom{x_2}{y_2} + b\binom{u_2}{v_2}$

and have made sure those two lines will intercept (so $u_1,v_1$ and $u_2,v_2$ aren't parallel), how do I find the intersection point elegantly?

Currently (I am using this in a C++ code), I need to do a lot of if() cases, since I cannot divide by 0, but in order to find the point, I need to substitute b in the formula

I get

$a = \dfrac{x_2-x_1+bu_2}{u_1}$

so here I have to check for $u_1\neq0$, and then substitute in the second line, where I then need to check for $v_2\neq0$, and this creates one hell a lot of code.

Is there a better way, am I just missing something easy?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The most elegant formulation (IMO) uses Cramer's Rule. You can reformulate your two equations into $$\begin{bmatrix} u_1 & -u_2\\ v_1 & -v_2 \end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix} a \\ b\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} x_2-x_1 \\ y_2 -y_1 \end{bmatrix}$$ and use determinants to solve for $a$.

Another nice way to think about it is areas: For segments AB and CD, the fraction along AB at which the intersection occurs is equal to the area of the triangle ACD divided by the area of the quadrilateral ACBD.

share|cite|improve this answer
That works absolutely beautifully, and is a 3 line code!! Love this answer! – SinisterMJ May 30 '13 at 17:40

You could use the elimination method to solve the simultaneous equations rather than the substitution method. If the two lines aren't parallel then there should be no cases when you could accidentally divide by $0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.