Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $T$ be a linear operator on a finite diemnsional inner product space $V$.
Prove that if $\beta$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$ then $T(\beta)$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$.

Proof
Let $\beta=\{v_1,\dots,v_n\}$ be an orthonormal basis for $V$ so $T(\beta)$.
$\langle T(v_i),T(v_j)\rangle=\langle v_i,v_j\rangle =\delta_{ij}$ , therefore $T(\beta)$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$.
The first equality is from the equivalent theorem $\langle T(x),T(y)\rangle=\langle x,y\rangle$.
I wonder why the last sentence means that $T(\beta)$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$.
They are linearly independent, of course, but they do span $V$? How can show that?


Sorry to make you be confused. I omitted this information : $TT^*=T^*T=I$.

share|improve this question
1  
This result is clearly false for a general linear operator $T$. Are you perhaps assuming $T$ is unitary (or an orthogonal map in the real case)? –  Ted Shifrin May 29 '13 at 14:28
1  
The claim is wrong, for example if $T$ is not injective or not orthogonal –  Hagen von Eitzen May 29 '13 at 14:29
    
Given your condition that $<T(v_i), T(v_j)> = <v_i, v_j>$, what properties of $T$ are there? Do you want $T$ to be a unitary operator? –  Calvin Lin May 29 '13 at 14:34
    
The claim is precisely the characterization of orthogonal maps (which, of course, are bijective) so it can't be true in general. –  DonAntonio May 29 '13 at 14:35
    
@DonAntonio You're right. Then why $T(\beta)$ can be a basis in here? –  noname May 29 '13 at 14:44

2 Answers 2

up vote 0 down vote accepted

So, now that you've added the hypothesis that $T$ is unitary, it makes sense. You've shown $T$ takes an orthonormal set of vectors to another orthonormal set. If $\{v_j\}$ is a basis, then $\dim V=n$, and so the $n$ linearly independent vectors $T(v_j)$ must likewise be a basis, as they span an $n$-dimensional subspace of $V$.

share|improve this answer

The statement ⟨T(x),T(y)⟩=⟨x,y⟩ means that T is an isomorphism, the result isn't true for an arbitrary linear operator T.

share|improve this answer
    
In fact that statement gives way more, @Adolfo : $\,T\,$ the is an orthogonal map (unitary in the complex case). –  DonAntonio May 29 '13 at 14:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.