Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

L a linear map of $\mathbb{R}^m$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
1)Does a linear map of two linear dependent vectors $\underline{x}$,$\underline{y} \in \mathbb{R}^m$ to two linear independent vectors $\underline{u}$,$\underline{v} \in \mathbb{R}^n$ exist/is possible?

2)a)Does a linear map of two linear independent vectors $\underline{x}$,$\underline{y} \in \mathbb{R}^m$ to two linear dependent vectors $\underline{u}$,$\underline{v} \in \mathbb{R}^n$ exist/is possible?
b)And if it is what are the consequences for $ker(L)$?

1)No, because if two vectors are dependent:
$\exists k \in \mathbb{R}$,
so that: $k\underline{x}=\underline{y}$
and a linear map to two is linear dependent vectors $\in \mathbb{R}^n$is only possible by two vectors $\in \mathbb{R}^m$.

2)a)Yes, f.ex.: $f:\mathbb{R}^3 -> \mathbb{R}^2$,
with $f(x,y,z)^T = (x, y-z)^T$ for $(0,1,0)^T$ and $(0,0,1)^T$.
b)with the rank-nullity theorem:
$ dim V - dim (im T)= dim (ker T)$
$3 - 2 = 1 = dim (ker T)$ in the example

My questions are:
Is my explication for 1) & 2) sufficient?and if not how can I improve it?
Is 2)b) I don't really know how to interprete that...

share|cite|improve this question
I'd like to suggest the following improvements for your MathJax code: use \to or \rightarrow for an arrow $\to$, and use \dim for $\dim$, \ker for $\ker$, and \operatorname{im} for $\operatorname{im}$ (these expressions should be upright). Please see here for how to typeset common math expressions with LaTeX, and see here for how to use Markdown formatting. – Zev Chonoles May 28 '13 at 22:25
Your questions (1) and (2)(a) look identical... – DonAntonio May 28 '13 at 22:26
up vote 0 down vote accepted


I'd explain (1) as follows, applying explicitly a linear map:

$$x,y\in\Bbb R^m\;,\;\;a\in\Bbb R\;,\;\;T\;\text{a linear map}\;,\; x=ay\implies Tx= T(ay)=aTy$$

You don't need to worry about (2)-(b) since (1)=(2)-(a) cannot be.

Edit: After the correction to (2)-(a): the zero map is a trivial example of this possibility, and in general, if

$$x,y\in\Bbb R^m\;,\;a\in\Bbb R\;\wedge\;Ty=aTx=T(ax)\implies T(y-ax)=0\implies \ker T\neq 0$$

share|cite|improve this answer
I made a mistake in 2)a) it should be the linear map of 2 independent vectors to 2 dependent vectors... – Phil May 28 '13 at 22:38

Well, it seems you get the idea.

To improve, introduce a letter for the linear map we are talking about, say, $T$. Then you can write like $k\,T(x)=T(kx)=T(y)$.

For 2b, if $k\,T(x)=T(y)$ then $kx-y\in\ker T$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.