Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there any reference which classifies the finite subgroups of $SU_2(C)$ up to conjugacy ?

What I know is that lifting the finite subgroups of $SO_3(R)$ by the map $SU_2(C) \rightarrow PSU_2(C)$ gives rise to the groups : cyclic groups of even order, dicyclic groups, binary tetrahedral/octahedral/icosahedral groups. But I dont know if they are the only one.

share|cite|improve this question
I claim that if you have all cyclic groups of even order, then you also have all cyclic groups of odd order! – Pete L. Clark May 20 '11 at 19:43
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The image of a finite subgroup of $\text{SU}(2)$ in $\text{SO}(3)$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{SO}(3)$; moreover, the kernel is either trivial or $\{ \pm 1 \}$. But $-1$ is the unique element of order $2$ in $\text{SU}(2)$, so any group of even order contains it.

I claim all the finite subgroups of odd order are cyclic. This follows because the inclusion $G \to \text{SU}(2)$ cannot define an irreducible representation of $G$ (since otherwise $2 | |G|$), hence it must break up into a direct sum of dual $1$-dimensional representations.

So once you know the finite subgroups of $\text{SO}(3)$, you already know the finite subgroups of $\text{SU}(2)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
The diagonal matrix with entries 1, -1 is also unitary and of order 2, so your uniqueness claim is incorrect. – i. m. soloveichik Aug 3 '12 at 0:27
Oops-sorry--ignore my comment above – i. m. soloveichik Aug 3 '12 at 0:39

Yes, the ADE classification enumerates all possible finite subgroups of $SU(2)$. Just a trivial correction, when it comes to the Abelian cyclic groups, A, the order may be both even and odd because $U(1)$ inside $SU(2)$ has all these $Z_N$ subgroups. The odd ones aren't linked to subgroups of $SO(3)$ in the same way.

The dicyclic groups, D, and the three exceptions, E, are as you wrote.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.