Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have two questions:

How does one apply the Fubini theorem?


Can it be applied to a trapezoid?

Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
You'll need to provide way more context to get a (useful) answer. Apply the theorem of fubini to what? And what do you mean by a trapeze here? – fgp May 25 '13 at 22:11
1. Exchange the integrals. 2. Yes. – Berci May 25 '13 at 22:21
Don't think so, @MichaelHardy : this really looks like not a real question, with so much context, explanation, ideas, background lacking. I didn't vote to close, but I can see I would easily. – DonAntonio May 25 '13 at 22:56
The question is: How is judiciously chosing the order of integration used to evaluate integrals, and does Fubini's theorem justify changes in the order of integration when the domain of the double integral is a trapezoid rather than the Cartesian product of two sets? Is it unclear that that's what's being asked? – Michael Hardy May 26 '13 at 0:10
I've started a discussion of this question on meta:… – Michael Hardy May 26 '13 at 16:39
up vote 14 down vote accepted

Fubini's theorem says a double integral (where the integral of the absolute value is finite) is equal to either of two iterated integrals. One concrete case: $$ \iint\limits_{[a,b]\times[c,d]} f(x,y)\,d(x,y) = \int_a^b\left(\int_c^d f(x,y) \, dy \right) \, dx = \int_c^d \left( \int_a^b f(x,y)\, dx \right) \, dy, $$ provided that $$ \iint\limits_{[a,b]\times[c,d]} |f(x,y)|\,d(x,y) <\infty. $$

One way to use this theorem is to exploit the fact that one of the two iterated integrals may be readily evaluated.

As for trapezoids, here is an example: $$T=\{(x,y) : 1\le y\le2,\ 0\le x\le y \}\tag{1}$$ Suppose one wants $$ \iint\limits_T e^{y^2} \,d(x,y). $$ Applying $(1)$, this becomes $$ \int_1^2 \left( \int_0^y e^{y^2} \, dx \right)\,dy. $$ This is easily evaluated, whereas if one had integrated first with respect to $y$ and afterward with respect to $x$, one would face the intractable integral $\int e^{y^2}\, dy$.

Does Fubini's theorem justify this? The answer is "yes" because one can view the integral as $$ \iint\limits_{[0,2]\times[1,2]} f(x,y) \, d(x,y) $$ where $$ f(x,y)=\begin{cases} e^{y^2} & \text{if }x\le y, \\[10pt] 0 & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$

share|cite|improve this answer
+1. Up to multiplication by the characteristic function like you did in the end, trapezoid or not, one can always apply Fubini to an integrable function. – 1015 May 27 '13 at 3:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.