Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As part of an exercise including gamma functions and Laguerre polynomials, I need to show that for a Laguerre polynomial $L_n(x)$, $$\int\limits_0^\infty L_n(x)x^ke^{-x}dx = 0 \textrm{ with } n \in \mathbb{N} \textrm{ and }k \in \{0,1,\dots,n-1\}$$ I've managed to narrow it down to proving that $$\sum\limits_{i=0}^n\frac{(-1)^{n-i}(k+i)!}{(i!)^2(n-i)!} = 0\textrm{ with } n \in \mathbb{N} \textrm{ and }k \in \{0,1,\dots,n-1\}$$ But this is where I'm stuck. I used Maple and WolframAlpha to turn this sum into $$\frac{k!(-1)^n\Gamma(n-k)}{\Gamma(-k)\Gamma(n+1)^2}$$ Which is $0$ since $\Gamma(-k)$ would be infinity, due to the Gamma function having simple poles in the negative integers. However, neither Maple or Wolfram can tell me how I convert the sum into this fraction of gamma functions. Am I missing something obvious or are there any tricks to get there?

share|improve this question
    
The definition as given by the exercise would be $$P_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nn!}{2\pi i} \oint_\Sigma \frac{\Gamma(t-n)}{\Gamma(t+1)^2}x^tdt.$$ where $\Sigma$ is a closed curve that goes around the points $0, 1, \dots, n$ counterclockwise once. –  Koeneuze May 25 '13 at 13:43
    
rewrite $ x^{k } $ as a linear combination of Laguerre polynomials $ L_{m} (x) $ and use the orthogonality property $ \int_{0}^{\infty} L_{m}(x)L_{n}(x)exp(-x)dx =0 $ –  Jose Garcia May 25 '13 at 13:47
    
Perhaps I should've mentioned this, but Laguerre polynomials aren't actually part of my course and this exercise is where they were first introduced, so I would not be allowed to use this property without proving it first. Would it be wise to prove this property or to continue looking for a more direct solution? –  Koeneuze May 25 '13 at 13:51
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

With the definition you have given, \begin{align}\int_0^{\infty}L_n(x)x^ke^{-x}dx&=\frac{(-1)^n n!}{2\pi i}\oint_{\Sigma}\frac{\Gamma(t-n)}{\Gamma^2(t+1)}\left(\int_0^{\infty}x^{t+k}e^{-x}dx\right)dt=\\ &=\frac{(-1)^n n!}{2\pi i}\oint_{\Sigma}\frac{\Gamma(t-n)\Gamma(t+k+1)}{\Gamma^2(t+1)}dt \end{align} What are the singular points of the integrand?

  • $\Gamma(t-n)$ has simple poles at $t=n,n-1,n-2,\ldots$. However, almost all of these poles, namely $t=-1,-2,\ldots$ are compensated by the poles of one of the $\Gamma(t+1)$ in the denominator.

  • Also, $\Gamma(t+k+1)$ has simple poles at $-k-1,-k-2,\ldots$ but all of them are compensated by the poles of the second $\Gamma(t+1)$.

Thus we have simple poles at $t=n,n-1,\ldots,0$ - precisely those inside of $\Sigma$. But now, instead of shrinking the integration contour, let us expand it to infinity. On the circle $|t|=R$, we have (think why) $$\frac{\Gamma(t-n)\Gamma(t+k+1)}{\Gamma^2(t+1)}=O\left(R^{k-n-1}\right)\qquad \text{as}\;R\rightarrow\infty.$$ Therefore, the integral over this circle will be (at most) $O\left(R^{k-n}\right)$, but this goes to zero as $R\rightarrow\infty$ for $k<n$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! I used the same reasoning with the poles of the gamma, but turned it into a summation rather than changing the order of integration. –  Koeneuze May 25 '13 at 15:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.