Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.
  1. If I submit a paper at other place (for example vixra) first, can I (modify it and) submit it to arxiv again?

  2. Is it valuable to publish a paper at the vixra?

  3. Except arxiv and vixra, does any other good place to submit a maths paper(not only upload a PDF document).

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Zhen Lin, Chris Godsil, Amzoti, Lord_Farin, Guess who it is. May 30 '13 at 16:07

Questions on Mathematics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to math within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

You can also ask at academia.stackexchange.com –  ziyuang May 25 '13 at 15:52
3. There may be area-specific places to submit your paper, such as eprint.iacr.org for cryptography. –  TMM May 25 '13 at 16:18
Thank you, I will give up the vixra. In fact, I can not use my arxiv account again with the admin note: due to use of pseudonym against arXiv policy. I do not use the Chinese spelling as my name, only call me Strongart which I have used at many places. I want to find place for the pure maths. –  Strongart May 27 '13 at 11:58
Unfortunately I arrived too late to add an answer in defense of viXra, so briefly, viXra is the only repository fully open to all authors and submission, so naturally it has a high proportion of low quality papers. It is easy to pick out examples of such papers but there are over 5000 on the site so if you look harder you may also find some interesting ones. continued... –  Philip Gibbs Jun 18 '13 at 20:23
... viXra does not make any attempt to build a reputation for quality by filtering papers or through the reputation of any of its administrators including myself. While I am flattered by the kind comments below about myself and my blog viXra log, this has no bearing on the reputation of viXra. viXra is an open repository, not a journal, so reputation is not important. continued... –  Philip Gibbs Jun 18 '13 at 20:28

6 Answers 6

The arXiv is the natural place to send mathematics preprints. Many of the worlds mathematicians (ranging from the very top to undergraduate-level) send their preprints there. One can also submit a paper to the arXiv then subsequently update it.

Vixra is an absolute joke. It's where people send rubbish papers that can't pass the arXiv's very modest standards. I would strongly advise against this.

The alternative is to put the paper on a personal website.

share|improve this answer
One of the latest papers on Vixra is "A Proof of the Goldbach Conjecture" by induction. Hmm... –  Pedro Tamaroff May 25 '13 at 12:58
vixra.org/pdf/1305.0143v1.pdf –  Alex J Best May 25 '13 at 13:15
Sorry, but that proof of the Goldbach conjecture must be wrong. See vixra.org/abs/1301.0129 :P –  Joel Reyes Noche May 25 '13 at 13:17
@julien: With the two assumptions "$0=1$" and "$0\neq 1$" it is trivial to prove the Riemann Hypothesis. And its negation! –  Asaf Karagila May 25 '13 at 13:33
@julien: Nah. Also note that your winner there has only one reference: Wikipedia. –  Asaf Karagila May 25 '13 at 13:52

Vixra is an absolute joke. It's where people send rubbish papers that can't pass the arXiv's very modest standards. I would strongly advise against this.

Yes, sadly true. It is unfortunate that it has become that way. When I first heard about it, back in 2009, I thought it would be a good place to post early manuscripts for dissemination, particularly for researchers that, for whatever reason, do not currently have an affiliation. Now, as you say, serious people without an affiliation should rely on their own sites.

share|improve this answer
??? affiliation is not necessary to publish on Arxiv. –  L.G. May 25 '13 at 13:21
@O.L. One reason why vixra exists is the arXiv's endorsement system, a process you need to go through if you have no prior submissions and no affiliation. –  Martin May 25 '13 at 13:55
@Martin: If somebody outside academia with no research record wants to put a paper on Arxiv, it is reasonable to ask him to convince at least one specialist of non-zero value of his results. This is not that hard. –  L.G. May 25 '13 at 20:40
@O.L. Apparently it is :-) –  Martin May 25 '13 at 20:55
What about high schoolers and middle schoolers? There exists students who are capable of graduate level work but are certainly not networked. To get other professors to look at their work is not a straightforward task as some may believe –  frogeyedpeas Jun 26 '13 at 4:41

I regularly use Arxiv since at least 1998. The first time I've heard about Vixra was reading your post a few minutes ago.

UPD: The paper titles in the Mathematical Physics section of Vixra are simply mind-blowing:

  • Calculate Universe 3 – Planck Units

  • Saint-Venant's Principle: Rationalized and Rational

  • Poster 6 for the Icm 2 Conference, CZ

  • The Structure of Information

  • The Genesis of Circle

  • $\ldots$

share|improve this answer
Same here. First time I've ever heard of vixra. I am already addicted... –  1015 May 25 '13 at 13:23

Oh good. This author solved two Millenium Prize problems in one short 5 page paper.


share|improve this answer
I saw this one too ^^ you just can't make this stuff up! –  Olivier Bégassat May 26 '13 at 3:42
This particular paper strikes me as parody, but who knows? –  Grumpy Parsnip May 30 '13 at 16:08
Is this a joke? –  frogeyedpeas Jun 26 '13 at 4:43

In addition to the other answers, which are valid and should be heeded, I found several other reasons not to submit a paper to vixra.

  1. According to vixra itself, it is a parody of arXiv.
  2. The individuals who run the vixra website don't provide their names, nor street addresses or other contact information or affiliation, merely a gmail address on the viXra contact page.
  3. Vixra knowingly publishes papers that are partially incorrect. I don't know how a scholarly paper in mathematics can be "partially incorrect", but that's vixra's description.
  4. Vixra has papers in subject categories besides mathematics and physics. Mind science, religion and spirituality (including mythology) caught my attention in particular. While interesting, it doesn't impart a serious tone.

I think viXra was founded with genuinely good intent. While I personally am an advocate of arXiv, I am sympathetic to those who are disaffected based on unfortunate past experiences. viXra is not a serious eprint choice for a mathematics paper submission though.


Item 2 in my answer may not be entirely correct. There is a Twitter account that is linked to viXra from the viXra blog. The profile reads as follows:

Philip Gibbs  @viXra
Independent physicist, mathematician, rebel blogger, founder of viXra.
Essex, UK · blog.viXra.org

Vixra has an active blog, established in 2009, which received over 1 million views according to the author. This post summarizes 2012 usage counts of the viXra eprint service. For comparison purposes, you may want to glance at a very brief post I wrote about arXiv, which included monthly arXiv submission counts since 1991.

*I'm uncertain whether the site is viXra or Vixra. I still don't recommend submitting papers to it, before trying arXiv first. There are reasons why you may not want to submit a paper to viXra even if rejected by arXiv, but that is subject matter better addressed as a separate question, or elsewhere.

share|improve this answer
A scholarly paper in mathematics can be partially incorrect by the inclusion of some wrong statement which doesn't invalidate its main result. –  Kaz May 25 '13 at 15:48
No journal makes statements that it only publishes correct papers! Even the most reputable journals have published wrong results... –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez May 25 '13 at 16:05
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez True, but very, very few journals explicitly state that they publish incorrect results knowingly. And that they are parodies of reputable journals. I acknowledged that this person was making a good-faith effort in that he is honest about what he is doing. –  Ellie Kesselman May 27 '13 at 4:42
NB: Philip Gibbs is somewhat active over at Physics.SE. –  Kyle Kanos Dec 21 '14 at 15:45

The individuals who run the vixra website don't provide their names, nor street addresses or other contact information or affiliation, merely a gmail address on the viXra contact page.

Phil Gibbs is a UK 2x IMO medalist and mathematical physicist, now probably best known for his instant combinations of Higgs data plots as they came out of the two collaborations taking data at CERN. You could read the physics news on his blog before it became the official news. Phil's synthesized plots were quite accurate.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.