Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Differential equation of solitary wave oscillons is defined by, $$ \Delta S -S +S^3=0 $$ How can we write this equation as, \begin{equation} \langle(\vec{\nabla}S)^2\rangle+\langle S^2\rangle-\langle S^4\rangle=0 \tag{1} \end{equation} where $\langle f\rangle:=\int d^Dx f(x)$. Furthermore, another virial identity can be found from the scaling transformation ($\vec{x}\to \mu \vec{x}$) by extremizing the scaled ($\vec{x}\to\mu \vec{x}$) of the action corresponding to $ \int d^Dx[(\vec{\nabla}S)^2+S^2-S^4/2]$ ( why $\frac{-S^4}{2}$): \begin{equation} (D-2)\langle(\vec{\nabla}S)^2\rangle+D\langle S^2\rangle-\frac{D}{2}\langle S^4\rangle=0 \tag{2} \end{equation} From Eqs. (1) and (2) one immediately finds \begin{equation} 2\langle S^2\rangle+\frac{1}{2}(D-4)\langle S^4\rangle=0\,, \end{equation} which equality can only be satisfied if $D<4$. D= Refers dimension.

I didn't understand the equation (2). Can someone do elaborately?

If you have any Query then ask me please. Thanks in advance.

I think this article will give you enough information: link check equations (21, 41, 42 43)

share|improve this question
2  
$\def\mean#1{\left<#1\right>}$To obtain (1) multiply the differential equation by $S$ and integrate, noting that (if $S$ decays for $|x| \to \infty$) by partial integration $$ \int_{\mathbb R^D} \Delta S \cdot S \, dx = -\int_{\mathbb R^D} \nabla S\cdot \nabla S\, dx = \mean{(\nabla S)^2}$$ –  martini May 22 '13 at 7:20
    
Dear martini, can you give me the source? And details calculations for the rest of order of (2)? –  Complex Guy May 22 '13 at 7:25
1  
This follows from the divergence theorem, and regarding (2) I do not quite understand where you want to scale? –  martini May 22 '13 at 7:30
    
I think this article will give you enough information. arxiv.org/abs/0802.3525 check equations (21, 41, 42 43) –  Complex Guy May 22 '13 at 7:32
    
If you have time then please look this question math.stackexchange.com/questions/397388/frequency-determination : Reference : arxiv.org/abs/0802.3525 equation no :(39,40) –  Complex Guy May 22 '13 at 7:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted
+50

The first part is simply multiplication by $S$, adding an integral sign, integration by parts for the first term.

For the second part consider a variation $\hat S(x;\mu)=S(x/\mu)$. Then do a change of variables $x=\mu y$. If the action is stationary under this spatial rescaling of $S$ then $d/d\mu$ at $\mu=1$ vanishes. Since the first term scales to $\mu^{D-2}$ with 2 from the derivative and $D$ from the Jacobian factor, this derivative gives a factor of $D-2$ as shown in the expression given. The rest are just Jacobian factors.

Edit: For example, $$ \left< (\nabla\hat S)^2\right> = \int d^Dx (\nabla_x S(x/\mu))^2 = \int \mu^D d^Dy (\mu^{-1} \nabla_y S(y))^2 = \mu^{D-2} \left< (\nabla S)^2\right>$$ The derivative at $\mu=1$ is exactly $(D-2) \left< (\nabla S)^2\right>$.


To clarify the first part, first multiply the equation by $-S$. Then integrate over all space. This gives the last two terms in the next line. Then for the first one, notice that $-S\nabla\cdot\nabla S$ can be integrated by parts using the divergence theorem. This shifts the $\nabla$ to the other term and changes the sign giving the shown result. If you prefer $\nabla\cdot(S\nabla S)$ can be expanded using the product rule and then the result substituted into the integral.

The factor of a half in the action arises from wanting the Euler-Lagrange equation for this action to be the given equation. The EL eqn contains $\partial L/\partial S$ so $L=S^2 + \alpha S^4$ results in a term $2S+ 4\alpha S^3$ so to get this agreeing with the eqn, up to an overall factor, choose $\alpha=-1/2$.

The deduction of (2) follows as I discuss above; rescale by $\mu$, then differentiate at $\mu=1$.

share|improve this answer
    
Can you elaborate more please? –  Complex Guy May 22 '13 at 10:03
    
Done, fixed typo too –  Sharkos May 22 '13 at 10:20
    
So without $\mu=1$ we can not get the equation? what about other two? and how will I get $\begin{equation} 2\langle S^2\rangle+\frac{1}{2}(D-4)\langle S^4\rangle=0\,, \end{equation}$ after comparsion the equation (1) and(2) –  Complex Guy May 22 '13 at 10:42
1  
No idea what you mean. You need the action to be invariant under small changes when $S$ obeys the eq motion. For localized excitations, the small change achieved by scaling by $\mu$ near 1 results in a change in $S$ to the version with $\mu^{D-2} \cdot+\mu^D\cdot +\mu^D\cdot$. The change for small $\mu$ is the derivative at $\mu=1$, the point where the configuration is the one we started with. Then $(2)-(D-2)\times (1)$ gives you the answer; it's clearly just eliminating the gradient term. Are you sure you're ready to be doing this material? –  Sharkos May 22 '13 at 11:50
    
Thank you I got it. –  Complex Guy May 22 '13 at 13:18

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.