Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A mapping $T$ of a metric space $X$ into a metric space $Y$ is continuous iff the inverse image of any open subset $Y$ is open subset of $X$.

Proof: (a)Suppose that $T$ is continuous. Let $S \subset Y$ be open and $S_0$ the inverse image of $S$. If $S_0 = \emptyset$, it is open. Let $S_0 \neq \emptyset$. For any $x_0\in S_0$ let $y_0=Tx_0$. Since $S$ is open, it contains an $\epsilon$-neighborhood $N$ of $y_0$. Since $T$ is continuous, $x_0$ has a $\delta$-neighborhood $N_0$ which is mapped into $N$. Since $N\subset S$, we have $N_0\subset S_0$ ...

Please You will be able explain me in detailed this part "Since $N\subset S$, we have $N_0\subset S_0$", I don't understand "we have $N_0\subset S_0$".

share|improve this question
    
I've changed the word "null" to the symbol of empty set because it was what it seemed you intended to write. So please, verify if I didn't change the meaning of your question. Good luck! –  user1620696 May 18 '13 at 3:58
    
What is your definition of continuous? –  Pedro Tamaroff May 18 '13 at 13:16

2 Answers 2

If $x \in N_0$, then $T(x) \in N$ (as "$N_0$ is mapped into $N$") so $T(x)$ is in $S$ (as we assume that $N \subset S$). So by definition, $x \in S_0$, as $S_0$ is defined the be the inverse image of $S$ ($S_0 = T^{-1}[S]$), so exactly the set of all $p$ with $T(p) \in S$, and the $x$ we start with is such a point.

share|improve this answer
    
When you say: "$T(x) \in S_0" is "T^{-1}(x) \in S_0$"? –  juaninf May 18 '13 at 14:19
    
@juaninf no, I mean $x \in S_0$ (corrected it) –  Henno Brandsma May 19 '13 at 8:18

Inverse images preserve set inclusion. More explicitly:

$x\in N_0 \Rightarrow Tx \in N \Rightarrow Tx \in S \Rightarrow x \in S_0.$

share|improve this answer
    
but Why $Tx \in S \Rightarrow x \in S_0$? –  juaninf May 18 '13 at 11:22
    
Which is the guarantee that such for all $\epsilon$ the $\delta$-neighborhood belong $S_0$? –  juaninf May 18 '13 at 11:31
    
Why the inverse image preserver set inclusion? –  juaninf May 18 '13 at 11:40

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.