Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking for examples (if there are such) of non-commutative rings without multiplicative identity which have the following properties:

1) finite with zero divisors

2) infinite with zero divisors

3) finite without zero divisors

4) infinite without zero divisors

I'll be grateful for any examples and hints. Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by user26857, Daniel W. Farlow, Shailesh, M. Vinay, Zachary Selk Jun 24 at 22:29

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user26857, Daniel W. Farlow, Shailesh, M. Vinay, Zachary Selk
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

For $2)$: Infinite matrices (over any ring) where almost all entries are $0$. For 1): $3\times 3$ matrices over a finite field with bottom row zero. – Jared May 17 '13 at 16:14
Almost all of our favorite non-commutative rings are matrix rings, and you can use pretty much any ring you want for their entries (even commutative rings) – Eric Stucky May 17 '13 at 16:15
Note that an ideal is any ring is a ring without identity. – Myself May 17 '13 at 16:25
@Myself: not necessarily! The ideal generated by a central idempotent $e$ in any ring has identity $e$. It is a unital ring but not a unital subring (in that it doesn't have the same unit as the overring). – Qiaochu Yuan May 17 '13 at 20:51
@QiaochuYuan Good point, I forgot about that. at AnyInterestedreader: see also Pierce decomposition – Myself May 17 '13 at 20:56
up vote 2 down vote accepted

As indicated in Jared's comment, one may find easy examples of 1), 2), and 4) by taking non-unital subrings (such as left ideals or two-sided ideals) of rings with identity.

The most interesting request here is 3). In fact, any finite nonzero associative ring $R$ (possibly without identity) without zero divisors is a field.

First, let's prove that $R$ in fact has an identity. Let $a \in R$ be a nonzero element. The function $f \colon R \to R$ defined by $\phi(x) = ax$ is injective, and since $R$ is finite, it's a bijection. Again, because $R$ is finite, this bijection must have finite order. Thus for some $d$, the function $\phi^d(x) = a^d x$ is the identity. It follows that $a^d \in R$ is an identity element.

At this point, it's a standard exercise to show that a finite ring with identity and no zero divisors is a division ring. (Hint: think about the function above for any $a \in R$.) And Wedderburn's little theorem states that any finite division ring is a field.

share|cite|improve this answer
1), 2) and 3) are clear to me know. But i still don't understand how to construct example for 4). Could you help me please? – Igor May 19 '13 at 12:37
How about the ideal $(x,y)$ in the free algebra $\math{Q} \langle x, y \rangle$? – Manny Reyes May 19 '13 at 17:52
I'll try to work with it. Thank you! – Igor May 19 '13 at 17:58
Sorry for the bad TeX in the comment. I meant to write: try the ideal $(x,y)$ in the free algebra $\mathbb{Q}\langle x,y \rangle$. This ring has no zero divisors, so it's ideal can't have any zero divisors. – Manny Reyes May 19 '13 at 18:29
Thanks for more details. – Igor May 20 '13 at 11:52

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.