Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\phi_t\in\mathbb{R}^n$, $\forall t\geq0$, and $\sup_t\|\phi_t\|_2^2\leq M<\infty$(euclidean norm). Define $n\times n$ positive definitive matrices as follow, $$P_{t+1}=\sum_{k=0}^t\phi_k\phi_k^T+P_0,\forall t\geq0, $$ where $P_0$ is a positive definitive matrix.

Is it suffices to show that $\phi_t^TP_t^{-1}\phi_t\to 0$?

I have tried in this way: Since $\phi_t^TP_t^{-1}\phi_t\leq \lambda_{max}(P_t^{-1})\|\phi_t\|_2^2$, if $\lambda_{max}(P_t^{-1})\to 0$, we can obtain the conclusion. However, a counterexample is $\phi_t=[1\;0]^T$, $\forall t$, and $P_0=I_{2\times2}$, then $$P_t=\begin{bmatrix} t+2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{bmatrix}, $$ and $\phi_t^TP_t^{-1}\phi_t\to 0$ but $\lambda_{max}(P_t^{-1})=1$, $\forall t$.

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.