# Advocating base 12 number system

I had a calculus professor who suggested we should be using base 12 number system. What are the advantages of using such a system?

-
I've occasionally wondered what the proponents of this claim are its advantages, but I've never thought about it. –  Michael Hardy May 14 '13 at 22:19
I wonder if "number systems" rather than "numeral systems" is the right name for a tag suitable for questions like this. –  Michael Hardy May 14 '13 at 22:20
I found some interesting answers here. To me the most interesting was the point about the subitizing range, which connects the mathematics to the biology/psychology of the human brain. –  alex.jordan May 14 '13 at 22:36
–  Asaf Karagila May 14 '13 at 22:42
In ancient Babylonia base 60 was used which is even better... –  azimut May 14 '13 at 23:31
show 1 more comment

As I see it, there are two advantages. First, it's not too different from base 10, so it comes fairly naturally. Second, 12 has many divisors, so $1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/9, 1/12,\ldots$ would all be terminating decimals.

-
Actually, the base 12 number system seems to have been common in the past, exactly due to 12 having many divisors. We even have traces of it in many languages (eleven and twelve, not oneteen and twoteen) –  vsz May 15 '13 at 6:23
Well, in the base $10$ number system it is as easy to multiply by 5 as to divide by 2 (the answers differ by 0 at the end). And it is as easy to multiply by 2, 4, 8... as to divide by 5, 25, 125..., by the same reason. So in the base $12$ number system it is as hard to divide by 2,3,4,6,12,4,9,16... as to multiply by 6,4,3,2,1,36,16,9..., and, therefore, one can trade division to multiplication in more instances...