Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

if my function is an immersion and say it is defined on a path connected open of an euclidian space.

immersions are locally injective. if we add the path connectedness could I assert that my immersion is injective? If not I would be grateful to you for giving me a counterexample.

share|cite|improve this question
Think of a periodic parametrization of the figure eight by the reals, for example. – t.b. May 15 '11 at 2:31
up vote 2 down vote accepted

$\mathbb{R}$ is path connected, and $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^2$ defined by $f(t)=(\cos(t),\sin(t))$ is an immersion because $$d_tf=[-\sin(t)\quad\cos(t)]$$ is never of rank 0, but it is not injective.

share|cite|improve this answer
Of course, I agree, but the downside of this example is that the image still is an embedded submanifold, so it fails to exhibit one important feature of immersions, namely that you get an embedded manifold locally, but not globally. – t.b. May 15 '11 at 2:36
I can see where my confusion comes from: usually when we have a property P that is locally verified in a connected space and if we prove that P is true on an open and closed part of a space then P is valid on the whole space – El Moro May 15 '11 at 2:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.