Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have to prove that any uncountable $B\subseteq \mathbb{R}$, where $(\mathbb{R},\epsilon^1)$ is euclidean topology and topology on B is relative, is separable. And I know it's true because every subset of separable metric space is separable.

But what if we are given separable space $(X,\tau)$, $X$ uncountable, and $A \subseteq X$ uncountable subset with relative topology. Is $(A,\tau_A)$ separable and if it is, how to prove it?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Consider the Niemytzki (or Moore) plane. This space is separable (the family of points with both coordinates rational is dense), but the $x$-axis $A = \{ \langle x , 0 \rangle : x \in \mathbb{R} \}$ is an uncountable closed discrete subset (and so $A$ with the subspace topology is discrete, and is therefore not separable).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for answer, link and counterexample =) You helped a lot. – Meow May 14 '13 at 8:32

Another example is this;

Let $ \omega$ denote infinite countable cardinal and $\mathcal E \subset [\omega]^\omega$ is a maximal almost disjoint family, where $[\omega]^\omega = \{ A \subset \omega: |A| = \omega \}$. Let $\Psi(\mathcal E)$ denote the topological space whose point-set is $\omega \cup \mathcal E$, with the topology generated by isolating each $\alpha \in \omega$, and the basic nbhds about $E \in \mathcal E$ are all sets of the form $\{E\}\cup (E\setminus F)$, where $F \in [E]^{< \omega}$. This we can called $\Psi$ space.

Claim: It is separable. However the subspace $\mathcal E$ of $\Psi$ is uncountable closed discrete, and hence it is not separeblae.

share|cite|improve this answer

The Sorgenfrey Plane is another example. It's a separable space, but the antidiagonal line {⟨x,-x⟩:x∈R} is discrete and uncountable.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.