Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is F $\implies$ T taken as true? Why is this the "convention"?

share|cite|improve this question
So is this operation defined. – Harold May 13 '13 at 8:21
Otherwise "$\implies$" would be the same thing as "$\iff$". – Marc van Leeuwen May 13 '13 at 8:25
You can prove, using some logic axiomatization, that for $x=False$ $x\Rightarrow \overline x$ – Harold May 13 '13 at 8:27
This might help to understand the pragmatic point, which might by taken before the interpretation of the arrow $P \Longrightarrow Q$ as "$P$ implies $Q$": You consider function of two statements ($Q,P$) which both have two possible values ("true" and "false") and a composed statement (like $P \Longrightarrow Q$) also has one of two possible values. This is why there are $2^4$ truth functions and all must have some name. "It's defined that way" means the arrow is one of the functions for which $( false \Longrightarrow true ) = true$. – NikolajK May 13 '13 at 8:46
up vote 11 down vote accepted

It's a convention in classical logic. Not all logical systems make this convention.

To see why this convention makes sense, consider a statement of the form $P\implies Q$, which I make, swearing that I'm telling the truth. When will you be able to sue me for lying? Well, if $P$ is true, but $Q$ is false then certainly you can sue me. But if $P$ is not true and $Q$ is, and you try to sue me, the judge will wonder what the hell you want. I only said that if $P$ is true then $Q$ is true. So, if $P$ is false, I did not commit to anything and thus your case is dismissed (i.e., I was telling the truth).

The point is that the implication is material implication, not that of causal implication. You may disagree with that interpretation and develop a logic where it is interpreted differently (for instance, in paraconsistent logic a statement of the form $F\implies T$ is dismissed as meaningless, not having any truth value (simply saying, don't bother about such nonsense as pondering what results from a false assumption)). Still, using classical logic in mathematics is very powerful, and so we make this convention.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.