Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is my first course in differential forms so it might be a trivial question. If $\mu$ is a $n-1$-form on $n$-dim manifold $X$ the book uses that


Is this expression valid for all $\mu$ and $X$? If that is true doesn't by Stokes theorem follow that $\int_{\partial X}\mu=0$ for every $\mu$?

share|cite|improve this question
No, not all forms are closed. – Muphrid May 9 '13 at 14:13
Is it true $\int_X\mu=0$ for closed $\mu$? – John Peter May 9 '13 at 14:15
What you have written is not true in general. Is there some other condition on $X$ which you've forgotten to mention? Is $X$ a closed manifold? – Santiago Canez May 9 '13 at 14:15
Well I am interested in what conditions on $X$ and $\mu$ I need to impose. The book I am using does not state them explicitly in the computation. Is it enough that $X$ is compact? – John Peter May 9 '13 at 14:17
So $X$ is a manifold with boundary? This was not clear from the outset. – Harald Hanche-Olsen May 9 '13 at 14:18

If $X$ is an $n$-dimensional manifold with boundary then for any $n-1$-form $\mu$ with compact support, $$\int_Xd\mu=\int_{\partial X}\mu.$$ This is Stokes' theorem. If there is no boundary, i.e., if $\partial X=\emptyset$, then the boundary integral is zero, and hence so is the other integral. But otherwise, you cannot expect the integral to vanish.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.